为什么保罗不知道自己的处境?认识神的不同方式又有什么不同?

Ayelet Even-Ezra
{"title":"为什么保罗不知道自己的处境?认识神的不同方式又有什么不同?","authors":"Ayelet Even-Ezra","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter revolves around two problems that intrigued medieval masters the most concerning Paul's rapture: how to define his mode of cognition during rapture, while he himself confessed not to have known whether his soul was in or out of his body, and how does his mode of knowing God then differ from others. It examines the attempts of our group of theologians to classify the ecstatic mode of vision, while being aware of the tension between the rational theologian-observer and the experiencing subject. It discusses Augustine’s position as to Paul's self-ignorance, his threefold division of visions into corporeal, imaginative, and intellectual, then twelfth-century further developments, in which Paul's vision was framed between earthly faith and the heavenly, beatific vision. It then shows that in the early-thirteenth century, more cognitions joined the taxonomic parade: the visions of prophets, contemplators, Christ, Moses, scriptural exegetes, angels, and even God's knowledge of himself. This intense preoccupation with taxonomy, together with the perception of the self as both experiencing and observing, it is argued, served this community of theologians to map the field in which they operate and negotiate their position in it.","PeriodicalId":311870,"journal":{"name":"Ecstasy in the Classroom","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why was Paul ignorant of his own state, and how do various modes of cognizing God differ?\",\"authors\":\"Ayelet Even-Ezra\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter revolves around two problems that intrigued medieval masters the most concerning Paul's rapture: how to define his mode of cognition during rapture, while he himself confessed not to have known whether his soul was in or out of his body, and how does his mode of knowing God then differ from others. It examines the attempts of our group of theologians to classify the ecstatic mode of vision, while being aware of the tension between the rational theologian-observer and the experiencing subject. It discusses Augustine’s position as to Paul's self-ignorance, his threefold division of visions into corporeal, imaginative, and intellectual, then twelfth-century further developments, in which Paul's vision was framed between earthly faith and the heavenly, beatific vision. It then shows that in the early-thirteenth century, more cognitions joined the taxonomic parade: the visions of prophets, contemplators, Christ, Moses, scriptural exegetes, angels, and even God's knowledge of himself. This intense preoccupation with taxonomy, together with the perception of the self as both experiencing and observing, it is argued, served this community of theologians to map the field in which they operate and negotiate their position in it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecstasy in the Classroom\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecstasy in the Classroom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecstasy in the Classroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章围绕着两个问题展开,这两个问题引起了中世纪大师对保罗被提的最大兴趣:如何定义他在被提期间的认知模式,而他自己承认不知道他的灵魂是在他的身体里还是在他的身体外面,以及他当时认识上帝的模式与他人有何不同。它考察了我们这群神学家对狂喜的视觉模式进行分类的尝试,同时意识到理性的神学家观察者和经验主体之间的紧张关系。它讨论了奥古斯丁对保罗自我无知的看法,他将异象分为肉体的,想象的,和智力的,然后是十二世纪的进一步发展,保罗的异象被框定在世俗信仰和天堂的,幸福的异象之间。然后,它表明,在13世纪早期,更多的认知加入了分类学的游行:先知的异象,修行者,基督,摩西,圣经注释者,天使,甚至上帝对自己的认识。他们认为,这种对分类学的强烈关注,以及对自我既是体验又是观察的认知,为神学家群体绘制了他们在其中操作和协商自己在其中位置的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why was Paul ignorant of his own state, and how do various modes of cognizing God differ?
The chapter revolves around two problems that intrigued medieval masters the most concerning Paul's rapture: how to define his mode of cognition during rapture, while he himself confessed not to have known whether his soul was in or out of his body, and how does his mode of knowing God then differ from others. It examines the attempts of our group of theologians to classify the ecstatic mode of vision, while being aware of the tension between the rational theologian-observer and the experiencing subject. It discusses Augustine’s position as to Paul's self-ignorance, his threefold division of visions into corporeal, imaginative, and intellectual, then twelfth-century further developments, in which Paul's vision was framed between earthly faith and the heavenly, beatific vision. It then shows that in the early-thirteenth century, more cognitions joined the taxonomic parade: the visions of prophets, contemplators, Christ, Moses, scriptural exegetes, angels, and even God's knowledge of himself. This intense preoccupation with taxonomy, together with the perception of the self as both experiencing and observing, it is argued, served this community of theologians to map the field in which they operate and negotiate their position in it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信