Alyaziya Almheiri, Z. Maamar
{"title":"IoT Protocols – MQTT versus CoAP","authors":"Alyaziya Almheiri, Z. Maamar","doi":"10.1145/3454127.3456594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usage of Internet of Things has increased in the recent years allowing a new way of connecting devices together. Many transactions happen over the IoT calling for protocols to ensure the efficiency and management of the communication traffic. This paper examines 2 particular protocols, Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and Constrained application protocol (CoAP). The main differences between MQTT and CoAP that MQTT runs over TCP and CoAP runs over UDP. MQTT uses three level of QoS to ensure the message delivery while CoAP uses 4 types of transmission attempts which are confirmable, non-confirmable, acknowledgment, and rest. Through a set of experiments, we show that MQTT is more accurate when ensuring packet delivery. However, CoAP is better when it comes to performance when sending a limited number of messages.","PeriodicalId":432206,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3454127.3456594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,物联网的使用有所增加,为连接设备提供了一种新的方式。许多事务发生在物联网上,需要协议来确保通信流量的效率和管理。本文研究了两个特定的协议,消息队列遥测传输(MQTT)和约束应用协议(CoAP)。MQTT和CoAP之间的主要区别是MQTT在TCP上运行,而CoAP在UDP上运行。MQTT使用三个级别的QoS来确保消息传递,而CoAP使用4种类型的传输尝试,分别是可确认的、不可确认的、确认的和休息的。通过一组实验,我们证明MQTT在保证包的传递方面更加准确。但是,在发送有限数量的消息时,CoAP在性能方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IoT Protocols – MQTT versus CoAP
The usage of Internet of Things has increased in the recent years allowing a new way of connecting devices together. Many transactions happen over the IoT calling for protocols to ensure the efficiency and management of the communication traffic. This paper examines 2 particular protocols, Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and Constrained application protocol (CoAP). The main differences between MQTT and CoAP that MQTT runs over TCP and CoAP runs over UDP. MQTT uses three level of QoS to ensure the message delivery while CoAP uses 4 types of transmission attempts which are confirmable, non-confirmable, acknowledgment, and rest. Through a set of experiments, we show that MQTT is more accurate when ensuring packet delivery. However, CoAP is better when it comes to performance when sending a limited number of messages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信