Halvor Nordby
{"title":"Verdier og kommunikasjon i konfliktsituasjoner","authors":"Halvor Nordby","doi":"10.23865/noasp.103.ch4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good communication between child protection workers and families is crucial for cooperation and agreement about decisions regarding child care. This chapter focuses on challenges in this communication related to value conflicts – conflicts in which fundamental disagreement is grounded in opposing values. The chapter uses concepts from philosophy of mind and language to understand value conflicts in child protection services. The key theoretical idea is that beliefs and thoughts are different from value preferences. While beliefs and thoughts are mental representations that are true or false depending on how the world is, persons’ values are preferences directly related to activities or objects that are of fundamental importance to them. This means that telling others, explicitly or implicitly, that their values are false involves a categorical mistake and will typically be experienced as a form of value imperialism that undermines cooperation and aims of shared understanding in child protection work. Value preferences related to child care can nevertheless be explored and challenged in various ways, for instance by focusing on tensions between values, or on beliefs that values are grounded in. The chapter uses case studies to clarify these implications in professional child protection.","PeriodicalId":427663,"journal":{"name":"Verdier i barnevern","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verdier i barnevern","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.103.ch4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童保护工作者和家庭之间的良好沟通对于就儿童保育决策进行合作和达成一致至关重要。本章关注的是这种沟通中与价值观冲突相关的挑战——在价值观冲突中,根本的分歧是基于对立的价值观。本章运用心灵哲学和语言哲学的概念来理解儿童保护服务中的价值冲突。关键的理论观点是,信仰和思想不同于价值偏好。信仰和思想是一种心理表征,是对还是错取决于世界是怎样的,而人的价值观是与对他们至关重要的活动或对象直接相关的偏好。这意味着,明确或含蓄地告诉他人,他们的价值观是错误的,这是一个绝对的错误,通常会被视为一种价值帝国主义,破坏了儿童保护工作中的合作和共同理解的目标。然而,与儿童保育相关的价值偏好可以通过各种方式进行探索和挑战,例如,通过关注价值观之间的紧张关系,或者关注价值观所基于的信仰。本章使用案例研究来阐明专业儿童保护的这些含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verdier og kommunikasjon i konfliktsituasjoner
Good communication between child protection workers and families is crucial for cooperation and agreement about decisions regarding child care. This chapter focuses on challenges in this communication related to value conflicts – conflicts in which fundamental disagreement is grounded in opposing values. The chapter uses concepts from philosophy of mind and language to understand value conflicts in child protection services. The key theoretical idea is that beliefs and thoughts are different from value preferences. While beliefs and thoughts are mental representations that are true or false depending on how the world is, persons’ values are preferences directly related to activities or objects that are of fundamental importance to them. This means that telling others, explicitly or implicitly, that their values are false involves a categorical mistake and will typically be experienced as a form of value imperialism that undermines cooperation and aims of shared understanding in child protection work. Value preferences related to child care can nevertheless be explored and challenged in various ways, for instance by focusing on tensions between values, or on beliefs that values are grounded in. The chapter uses case studies to clarify these implications in professional child protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信