胃食管结癌

D. Joyce, R. Schwarz
{"title":"胃食管结癌","authors":"D. Joyce, R. Schwarz","doi":"10.2310/7800.16054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancers of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remain challenging malignancies to treat effectively. The GEJ represents the transition between esophagus and stomach, and approaching GEJ cancers as “esophageal” or as “gastric” cancers, a priori will run risk for excluding some more appropriate therapeutic options based on actual location. Gastroesophageal junction cancers are increasing in incidence, in particular at the distal esophageal and gastric cardia locations. They may be discovered in an early stage on upper GI endoscopy, but when presenting with dysphagia symptoms they are often of more advanced stage. Endoscopic resection options are limited to non-ulcerated T1 lesions, and surgical resection as only therapy is accepted for nodal-negative T1 or T2 disease. All other mid-stage GEJ cancers should be considered for multimodality therapy and should undergo a formal and complete multidisciplinary evaluation process before any therapy is started. While the proper approach remains debated, most often trimodality therapy with preoperative chemoradiation followed by resection is being offered, as it offers the greatest likelihood for complete pathologic response and survival benefit but requires a shorter preoperative treatment duration. Perioperative chemotherapy remains acceptable as well, based on the patient’s tolerance for related toxicity. The Siewert classification with 3 subtypes of GEJ cancers, based on the relationship of the tumor’s epicenter to the gastric cardia, remains useful for planning resection approach and extent as well as reconstruction technique. Type I (proximal GEJ) tumors require esophageal resection with mediastinal and retrogastric lymphadenectomy; reconstruction most often involves a gastric tube pull-up. Type III (distal GEJ) lesions are gastric cancers that require total or proximal gastrectomy with D2 dissection; reconstruction often utilizes Roux-Y esophagojejunostomy, but may include small bowel interposition for proximal gastrectomy too. Best approaches to type II lesions (of the cardia) remain debated; complete resection through esophagectomy (as type I) or transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (as in type III with appropriate proximal extension) remain acceptable, as long as complete resection and proper extent lymphadenectomy are performed. Minimally invasive approaches (versus open), patient comorbidity, individual tumor extent and surgeon’s experience should determine the best individual choice for operative approach. Surgeons engaging in GEJ cancer care should be familiar with all aspects of multidisciplinary and operative treatment planning, and should be able to offer the most appropriate resection choice for the patient’s best benefit.\nThis review contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 100 references.\nKey words: adenocarcinoma, gastrectomy, gastroesophageal junction, laproscopy, lymphadenectomy, metastasis, minimally invasive esophagectomy","PeriodicalId":381094,"journal":{"name":"DeckerMed CGSO Case-Based Reviews","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer\",\"authors\":\"D. Joyce, R. Schwarz\",\"doi\":\"10.2310/7800.16054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cancers of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remain challenging malignancies to treat effectively. The GEJ represents the transition between esophagus and stomach, and approaching GEJ cancers as “esophageal” or as “gastric” cancers, a priori will run risk for excluding some more appropriate therapeutic options based on actual location. Gastroesophageal junction cancers are increasing in incidence, in particular at the distal esophageal and gastric cardia locations. They may be discovered in an early stage on upper GI endoscopy, but when presenting with dysphagia symptoms they are often of more advanced stage. Endoscopic resection options are limited to non-ulcerated T1 lesions, and surgical resection as only therapy is accepted for nodal-negative T1 or T2 disease. All other mid-stage GEJ cancers should be considered for multimodality therapy and should undergo a formal and complete multidisciplinary evaluation process before any therapy is started. While the proper approach remains debated, most often trimodality therapy with preoperative chemoradiation followed by resection is being offered, as it offers the greatest likelihood for complete pathologic response and survival benefit but requires a shorter preoperative treatment duration. Perioperative chemotherapy remains acceptable as well, based on the patient’s tolerance for related toxicity. The Siewert classification with 3 subtypes of GEJ cancers, based on the relationship of the tumor’s epicenter to the gastric cardia, remains useful for planning resection approach and extent as well as reconstruction technique. Type I (proximal GEJ) tumors require esophageal resection with mediastinal and retrogastric lymphadenectomy; reconstruction most often involves a gastric tube pull-up. Type III (distal GEJ) lesions are gastric cancers that require total or proximal gastrectomy with D2 dissection; reconstruction often utilizes Roux-Y esophagojejunostomy, but may include small bowel interposition for proximal gastrectomy too. Best approaches to type II lesions (of the cardia) remain debated; complete resection through esophagectomy (as type I) or transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (as in type III with appropriate proximal extension) remain acceptable, as long as complete resection and proper extent lymphadenectomy are performed. Minimally invasive approaches (versus open), patient comorbidity, individual tumor extent and surgeon’s experience should determine the best individual choice for operative approach. Surgeons engaging in GEJ cancer care should be familiar with all aspects of multidisciplinary and operative treatment planning, and should be able to offer the most appropriate resection choice for the patient’s best benefit.\\nThis review contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 100 references.\\nKey words: adenocarcinoma, gastrectomy, gastroesophageal junction, laproscopy, lymphadenectomy, metastasis, minimally invasive esophagectomy\",\"PeriodicalId\":381094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DeckerMed CGSO Case-Based Reviews\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DeckerMed CGSO Case-Based Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2310/7800.16054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DeckerMed CGSO Case-Based Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/7800.16054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

胃食管交界处癌(GEJ)仍然是具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤的有效治疗。GEJ代表食道和胃之间的过渡,将GEJ癌视为“食道癌”或“胃癌”,先验地排除了一些基于实际位置的更合适的治疗选择的风险。胃食管交界处癌的发病率正在增加,特别是在食管远端和贲门部位。它们可能在早期的上消化道内镜检查中被发现,但当出现吞咽困难症状时,它们通常是更晚期的症状。内镜切除选择仅限于非溃烂的T1病变,手术切除是淋巴结阴性的T1或T2疾病的唯一治疗方法。所有其他中期GEJ癌症应考虑多模式治疗,并应在任何治疗开始前进行正式和完整的多学科评估过程。虽然正确的方法仍有争议,但最常见的是术前放化疗后切除的三段式治疗,因为它提供了完全病理反应和生存益处的最大可能性,但需要更短的术前治疗时间。基于患者对相关毒性的耐受性,围手术期化疗也是可以接受的。基于肿瘤中心与贲门的关系,将GEJ癌分为3个亚型的Siewert分类,对于规划切除的入路和范围以及重建技术仍然有用。I型(近端GEJ)肿瘤需要食管切除术,同时行纵隔和胃后淋巴结切除术;重建通常包括胃管上拉。III型(远端GEJ)病变是胃癌,需要全胃或近端切除并D2剥离;重建通常采用Roux-Y食管空肠吻合术,但近端胃切除术也可能包括小肠介入。II型病变(心脏)的最佳治疗方法仍有争议;只要进行完全切除和适当程度的淋巴结切除术,通过食管切除术(如I型)或经食管胃切除术(如III型,适当近端延伸)进行完全切除仍然是可以接受的。微创入路(相对于开放入路)、患者合并症、个体肿瘤范围和外科医生的经验应决定手术入路的最佳个人选择。从事GEJ肿瘤治疗的外科医生应该熟悉多学科和手术治疗计划的各个方面,并且应该能够为患者提供最合适的切除选择,以获得最大的利益。本综述包含2张图,3张表,参考文献100篇。关键词:腺癌,胃切除术,胃食管交界,腹腔镜,淋巴结切除术,转移,微创食管切除术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
Cancers of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remain challenging malignancies to treat effectively. The GEJ represents the transition between esophagus and stomach, and approaching GEJ cancers as “esophageal” or as “gastric” cancers, a priori will run risk for excluding some more appropriate therapeutic options based on actual location. Gastroesophageal junction cancers are increasing in incidence, in particular at the distal esophageal and gastric cardia locations. They may be discovered in an early stage on upper GI endoscopy, but when presenting with dysphagia symptoms they are often of more advanced stage. Endoscopic resection options are limited to non-ulcerated T1 lesions, and surgical resection as only therapy is accepted for nodal-negative T1 or T2 disease. All other mid-stage GEJ cancers should be considered for multimodality therapy and should undergo a formal and complete multidisciplinary evaluation process before any therapy is started. While the proper approach remains debated, most often trimodality therapy with preoperative chemoradiation followed by resection is being offered, as it offers the greatest likelihood for complete pathologic response and survival benefit but requires a shorter preoperative treatment duration. Perioperative chemotherapy remains acceptable as well, based on the patient’s tolerance for related toxicity. The Siewert classification with 3 subtypes of GEJ cancers, based on the relationship of the tumor’s epicenter to the gastric cardia, remains useful for planning resection approach and extent as well as reconstruction technique. Type I (proximal GEJ) tumors require esophageal resection with mediastinal and retrogastric lymphadenectomy; reconstruction most often involves a gastric tube pull-up. Type III (distal GEJ) lesions are gastric cancers that require total or proximal gastrectomy with D2 dissection; reconstruction often utilizes Roux-Y esophagojejunostomy, but may include small bowel interposition for proximal gastrectomy too. Best approaches to type II lesions (of the cardia) remain debated; complete resection through esophagectomy (as type I) or transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (as in type III with appropriate proximal extension) remain acceptable, as long as complete resection and proper extent lymphadenectomy are performed. Minimally invasive approaches (versus open), patient comorbidity, individual tumor extent and surgeon’s experience should determine the best individual choice for operative approach. Surgeons engaging in GEJ cancer care should be familiar with all aspects of multidisciplinary and operative treatment planning, and should be able to offer the most appropriate resection choice for the patient’s best benefit. This review contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 100 references. Key words: adenocarcinoma, gastrectomy, gastroesophageal junction, laproscopy, lymphadenectomy, metastasis, minimally invasive esophagectomy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信