迁移到华盛顿中部的大鼠尾草是否会选择mesic斑块作为夏季栖息地?

G. Casady, J. Lowe, Michael T. Atamian
{"title":"迁移到华盛顿中部的大鼠尾草是否会选择mesic斑块作为夏季栖息地?","authors":"G. Casady, J. Lowe, Michael T. Atamian","doi":"10.1898/NWN22-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Summer brood-rearing habitat is important for sustaining populations of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Although Sage-Grouse in many populations move to more mesic sites during the late brood-rearing period, some populations do not select for these resources as strongly. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate the locations of 51 Sage-Grouse hens in the Crab Creek Management Unit in central Washington State. We compared their proximity to mesic patches with that of a set of random locations. We further compared the distance to mesic patches between brooding and non-brooding hens, wet and dry years, and early and late seasons. Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater affinity to mesic patches than random, nor did brooding hens show greater affinity to mesic patches than non-brooding hens. Further, Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater proximity to mesic patches in dry years compared to wet years, nor did they appear to move closer to mesic patches later in the summer. To evaluate differences in mesic and upland forage resources for Sage-Grouse, we measured percent cover and richness of forbs, along with overall horizontal cover, at 23 paired transects in mesic and upland sites. We found that whereas the cover of highly preferred forbs was higher in mesic sites, there was no difference between habitat types when moderately preferred forbs were also considered. Forb richness was higher in upland sites. We suggest that upland sites may have sufficient forb cover and richness for foraging translocated Sage-Grouse in the Crab Creek area during the brooding season.","PeriodicalId":142406,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern Naturalist","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DO TRANSLOCATED GREATER SAGE-GROUSE IN CENTRAL WASHINGTON SELECT MESIC PATCHES AS SUMMER HABITAT?\",\"authors\":\"G. Casady, J. Lowe, Michael T. Atamian\",\"doi\":\"10.1898/NWN22-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Summer brood-rearing habitat is important for sustaining populations of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Although Sage-Grouse in many populations move to more mesic sites during the late brood-rearing period, some populations do not select for these resources as strongly. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate the locations of 51 Sage-Grouse hens in the Crab Creek Management Unit in central Washington State. We compared their proximity to mesic patches with that of a set of random locations. We further compared the distance to mesic patches between brooding and non-brooding hens, wet and dry years, and early and late seasons. Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater affinity to mesic patches than random, nor did brooding hens show greater affinity to mesic patches than non-brooding hens. Further, Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater proximity to mesic patches in dry years compared to wet years, nor did they appear to move closer to mesic patches later in the summer. To evaluate differences in mesic and upland forage resources for Sage-Grouse, we measured percent cover and richness of forbs, along with overall horizontal cover, at 23 paired transects in mesic and upland sites. We found that whereas the cover of highly preferred forbs was higher in mesic sites, there was no difference between habitat types when moderately preferred forbs were also considered. Forb richness was higher in upland sites. We suggest that upland sites may have sufficient forb cover and richness for foraging translocated Sage-Grouse in the Crab Creek area during the brooding season.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northwestern Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northwestern Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN22-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN22-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要夏季育雏生境是大鼠尾草松鸡种群维持的重要生境。尽管在许多种群中,艾草松鸡在育雏后期会迁移到更密集的地点,但有些种群对这些资源的选择并不强烈。我们使用广义线性混合模型来评估华盛顿州中部螃蟹溪管理单位的51只艾草松鸡的位置。我们比较了它们与mesic patch的接近程度和一组随机位置的接近程度。我们进一步比较了孵蛋母鸡与非孵蛋母鸡、干湿年份、早季与晚季之间的距离。鼠尾草鸡对杂交种的亲和性不高于随机母鸡,孵鸡对杂交种的亲和性也不高于非孵鸡。此外,艾草松鸡在干旱年份与湿润年份相比,并没有表现出更接近梅属斑块,在夏季晚些时候,它们也没有表现出更靠近梅属斑块。为了评价灌丛和旱地鼠尾草牧草资源的差异,我们测量了灌丛和旱地鼠尾草牧草资源在23个成对样地上的覆盖度、丰富度以及总体水平覆盖度。结果表明,在中等偏好的生境类型中,高偏好的牧草覆盖面积较大,而中等偏好的牧草覆盖面积在不同生境类型中没有显著差异。植被丰富度在山地样地较高。我们认为,在蟹溪地区,高地可能有足够的牧草覆盖和丰富的牧草,以供迁徙的艾草松鸡在产卵季节觅食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DO TRANSLOCATED GREATER SAGE-GROUSE IN CENTRAL WASHINGTON SELECT MESIC PATCHES AS SUMMER HABITAT?
Abstract Summer brood-rearing habitat is important for sustaining populations of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Although Sage-Grouse in many populations move to more mesic sites during the late brood-rearing period, some populations do not select for these resources as strongly. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate the locations of 51 Sage-Grouse hens in the Crab Creek Management Unit in central Washington State. We compared their proximity to mesic patches with that of a set of random locations. We further compared the distance to mesic patches between brooding and non-brooding hens, wet and dry years, and early and late seasons. Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater affinity to mesic patches than random, nor did brooding hens show greater affinity to mesic patches than non-brooding hens. Further, Sage-Grouse hens did not show any greater proximity to mesic patches in dry years compared to wet years, nor did they appear to move closer to mesic patches later in the summer. To evaluate differences in mesic and upland forage resources for Sage-Grouse, we measured percent cover and richness of forbs, along with overall horizontal cover, at 23 paired transects in mesic and upland sites. We found that whereas the cover of highly preferred forbs was higher in mesic sites, there was no difference between habitat types when moderately preferred forbs were also considered. Forb richness was higher in upland sites. We suggest that upland sites may have sufficient forb cover and richness for foraging translocated Sage-Grouse in the Crab Creek area during the brooding season.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信