M. Evered, G. Menger, J. L. Keedy, Axel Schmolitzky
{"title":"面向对象的软件工程","authors":"M. Evered, G. Menger, J. L. Keedy, Axel Schmolitzky","doi":"10.1109/ACSC.2000.824382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object-oriented languages can potentially make a great contribution to enhancing software quality and supporting the software engineering process. Despite this potential, we contend that a number of central features of object-oriented languages are in fact contrary to well-known software engineering principles and goals and therefore represent a hindrance to software engineering rather than a contribution. In this paper we look at the class construct, inheritance, genericity and at object-oriented collection frameworks and suggest ways these could be modified to better supporting software engineering principles.","PeriodicalId":304540,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 23rd Australasian Computer Science Conference. ACSC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00518)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software engineering despite object-orientation\",\"authors\":\"M. Evered, G. Menger, J. L. Keedy, Axel Schmolitzky\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSC.2000.824382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object-oriented languages can potentially make a great contribution to enhancing software quality and supporting the software engineering process. Despite this potential, we contend that a number of central features of object-oriented languages are in fact contrary to well-known software engineering principles and goals and therefore represent a hindrance to software engineering rather than a contribution. In this paper we look at the class construct, inheritance, genericity and at object-oriented collection frameworks and suggest ways these could be modified to better supporting software engineering principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 23rd Australasian Computer Science Conference. ACSC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00518)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 23rd Australasian Computer Science Conference. ACSC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00518)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSC.2000.824382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 23rd Australasian Computer Science Conference. ACSC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00518)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSC.2000.824382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Object-oriented languages can potentially make a great contribution to enhancing software quality and supporting the software engineering process. Despite this potential, we contend that a number of central features of object-oriented languages are in fact contrary to well-known software engineering principles and goals and therefore represent a hindrance to software engineering rather than a contribution. In this paper we look at the class construct, inheritance, genericity and at object-oriented collection frameworks and suggest ways these could be modified to better supporting software engineering principles.