镜子中的空间:静止的框架/定格的静止

M. Kirsh
{"title":"镜子中的空间:静止的框架/定格的静止","authors":"M. Kirsh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1376065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this writing is to propose a frame of view, a form as the eternal world element, that is compatible with paradox within the history of ideas, modern discovery as they confront one another. Under special consideration are problems of representation of phenomena, life, the cosmos as the rational facility of mind confronts the physical/perceptual, and itself. Current topics in pursuit are near as diverse and numbered as are the possibilities for a world composed strictly of uniqueness able to fill infinite space; it is assumed that not all of the paths chosen in contemporary pursuits will produce coherent determinations in an appropriate frame able to accommodate a world of nominals in motion, containing motion, and is commensurate with basic physical law and the propagation of form, change from within. Intended as a potential guiding post for the aim of reason seeking to select, define and capture topics, chosen as special examples are the works of logistician/mathematician Lewis Carroll as he presents a paradox of actuality verses the reality of perception in Alice in Wonderland, the theory of relativity of Albert Einstein as he fails to elaborate a mathematics to communicate an inertial frame of reference, and the reconstruction ideas of Jacques Derrida as he refers for contrast with the scientific world view constructed of dualisms, monisms that are conceived to have no opposites. Supporting discussion is evolved from the works of Bertrand Russell, Erwin Schrodinger, Jurgen Habermas, Bronislaw Malinowski, Michel Foucault. \nKey Words: rationality and imagination, nihilism, first/third perspective, number/mass, supervenience, social and natural evolution, shape/form, ‘the concept’, natural ethic","PeriodicalId":218558,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Spaces in the Looking Glass: Stilling the Frame/Framing the Still\",\"authors\":\"M. Kirsh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1376065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this writing is to propose a frame of view, a form as the eternal world element, that is compatible with paradox within the history of ideas, modern discovery as they confront one another. Under special consideration are problems of representation of phenomena, life, the cosmos as the rational facility of mind confronts the physical/perceptual, and itself. Current topics in pursuit are near as diverse and numbered as are the possibilities for a world composed strictly of uniqueness able to fill infinite space; it is assumed that not all of the paths chosen in contemporary pursuits will produce coherent determinations in an appropriate frame able to accommodate a world of nominals in motion, containing motion, and is commensurate with basic physical law and the propagation of form, change from within. Intended as a potential guiding post for the aim of reason seeking to select, define and capture topics, chosen as special examples are the works of logistician/mathematician Lewis Carroll as he presents a paradox of actuality verses the reality of perception in Alice in Wonderland, the theory of relativity of Albert Einstein as he fails to elaborate a mathematics to communicate an inertial frame of reference, and the reconstruction ideas of Jacques Derrida as he refers for contrast with the scientific world view constructed of dualisms, monisms that are conceived to have no opposites. Supporting discussion is evolved from the works of Bertrand Russell, Erwin Schrodinger, Jurgen Habermas, Bronislaw Malinowski, Michel Foucault. \\nKey Words: rationality and imagination, nihilism, first/third perspective, number/mass, supervenience, social and natural evolution, shape/form, ‘the concept’, natural ethic\",\"PeriodicalId\":218558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1376065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1376065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章的目的是提出一种观点框架,一种作为永恒世界元素的形式,它与思想史上的悖论和现代发现相兼容,因为它们彼此对抗。特别考虑的问题是现象的表现,生命,宇宙作为精神的理性设施面对物理/感性,以及自身。当前所追求的主题几乎与一个严格由唯一性组成的世界的可能性一样多样化和数量众多,这个世界能够填补无限的空间;人们认为,并非所有在当代追求中选择的道路都能在一个适当的框架内产生连贯的决定,这个框架能够容纳一个运动中的、包含运动的、与基本物理定律和形式传播相称的世界,从内部变化。作为寻求选择、定义和捕捉主题的理性目标的潜在指南,选择作为特殊例子的是逻辑学家/数学家刘易斯·卡罗尔(Lewis Carroll)的作品,因为他在《爱丽丝梦游仙境》中提出了现实与感知现实的悖论,阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦(Albert Einstein)的相对论,因为他未能阐述数学来传达惯性参照系,以及雅克·德里达的重建思想,他指的是与科学世界观形成对比的二元论,一元论被认为没有对立面。支持性讨论从伯特兰·罗素、欧文·薛定谔、于尔根·哈贝马斯、布罗尼斯瓦夫·马林诺夫斯基、米歇尔·福柯的著作中演变而来。关键词:理性与想象、虚无主义、第一/第三视角、数量/质量、直觉、社会与自然进化、形状/形式、“概念”、自然伦理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Spaces in the Looking Glass: Stilling the Frame/Framing the Still
The purpose of this writing is to propose a frame of view, a form as the eternal world element, that is compatible with paradox within the history of ideas, modern discovery as they confront one another. Under special consideration are problems of representation of phenomena, life, the cosmos as the rational facility of mind confronts the physical/perceptual, and itself. Current topics in pursuit are near as diverse and numbered as are the possibilities for a world composed strictly of uniqueness able to fill infinite space; it is assumed that not all of the paths chosen in contemporary pursuits will produce coherent determinations in an appropriate frame able to accommodate a world of nominals in motion, containing motion, and is commensurate with basic physical law and the propagation of form, change from within. Intended as a potential guiding post for the aim of reason seeking to select, define and capture topics, chosen as special examples are the works of logistician/mathematician Lewis Carroll as he presents a paradox of actuality verses the reality of perception in Alice in Wonderland, the theory of relativity of Albert Einstein as he fails to elaborate a mathematics to communicate an inertial frame of reference, and the reconstruction ideas of Jacques Derrida as he refers for contrast with the scientific world view constructed of dualisms, monisms that are conceived to have no opposites. Supporting discussion is evolved from the works of Bertrand Russell, Erwin Schrodinger, Jurgen Habermas, Bronislaw Malinowski, Michel Foucault. Key Words: rationality and imagination, nihilism, first/third perspective, number/mass, supervenience, social and natural evolution, shape/form, ‘the concept’, natural ethic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信