减少蓝光眼镜对颜色的影响

Mareike Hübner, Christoph von Handorff
{"title":"减少蓝光眼镜对颜色的影响","authors":"Mareike Hübner, Christoph von Handorff","doi":"10.54352/dozv.mfuv9062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To investigate the influence of two different blue- light-filtering lenses on subjective colour perception, using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test. Material and Methods. Thirty subjects with normal colour vision performed the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test wearing three pairs of plano spectacle lenses. The total er- ror score was calculated with the “Farnsworth-Munsell Test Scoring Software“. The evaluated test lenses were the “Glacier Blue Shield“ (Shamir) and the “Wellness Protect 15“ (Eschen- bach) in addition to the 15 % grey tint (Hoya) as a reference lens. The transmission spectra of the lenses were measured beforehand with the spectrometer “Flame-S-UV-VIS-ES“ (“Ocean Optics“). Results. Using the univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, no significant difference could be detected in the colour discrimination capability between the reference lens from Hoya and the test lens from Sha- mir (p > 0.05). A significant deterioration was found with the “Wellness Protect 15“ lens from Eschenbach compared to the reference lens from Hoya (p < 0.001) and to the test lens from Shamir (p < 0.001). In addition, a median disparity of the third box (43 – 63 of the Hue test) against all the other boxes was noticed for both the test lenses and the reference lens. Conclusion. With the blue-light-filtering anti-reflection coating from Shamir no difference in colour discrimination could be observed in this study. Only a stronger blue-light- filtering lens like “Wellness Protect 15“ leads to a significant deterioration. The closer the colours are in the CIE colour triangle, the bigger the confusion. To test the quality of colours with these lenses the colour rendering index should also be evaluated. Keywords Blue-light-filtering lenses, Colour discrimination, Colour perception, Colour Rendering Index, Transmission","PeriodicalId":347784,"journal":{"name":"Optometry &amp; Contact Lenses","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Einfluss von blaulicht­reduzierenden Brillengläsern auf die Farbwahrnehmung\",\"authors\":\"Mareike Hübner, Christoph von Handorff\",\"doi\":\"10.54352/dozv.mfuv9062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. To investigate the influence of two different blue- light-filtering lenses on subjective colour perception, using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test. Material and Methods. Thirty subjects with normal colour vision performed the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test wearing three pairs of plano spectacle lenses. The total er- ror score was calculated with the “Farnsworth-Munsell Test Scoring Software“. The evaluated test lenses were the “Glacier Blue Shield“ (Shamir) and the “Wellness Protect 15“ (Eschen- bach) in addition to the 15 % grey tint (Hoya) as a reference lens. The transmission spectra of the lenses were measured beforehand with the spectrometer “Flame-S-UV-VIS-ES“ (“Ocean Optics“). Results. Using the univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, no significant difference could be detected in the colour discrimination capability between the reference lens from Hoya and the test lens from Sha- mir (p > 0.05). A significant deterioration was found with the “Wellness Protect 15“ lens from Eschenbach compared to the reference lens from Hoya (p < 0.001) and to the test lens from Shamir (p < 0.001). In addition, a median disparity of the third box (43 – 63 of the Hue test) against all the other boxes was noticed for both the test lenses and the reference lens. Conclusion. With the blue-light-filtering anti-reflection coating from Shamir no difference in colour discrimination could be observed in this study. Only a stronger blue-light- filtering lens like “Wellness Protect 15“ leads to a significant deterioration. The closer the colours are in the CIE colour triangle, the bigger the confusion. To test the quality of colours with these lenses the colour rendering index should also be evaluated. Keywords Blue-light-filtering lenses, Colour discrimination, Colour perception, Colour Rendering Index, Transmission\",\"PeriodicalId\":347784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry &amp; Contact Lenses\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry &amp; Contact Lenses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54352/dozv.mfuv9062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry &amp; Contact Lenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54352/dozv.mfuv9062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。采用法恩斯沃斯-孟塞尔100色相测试,研究两种不同的蓝光滤光镜片对主观色彩感知的影响。材料和方法。30名色觉正常的受试者戴着三副plano眼镜进行了Farnsworth-Munsell 100色相测试。总误差率用“范斯沃斯-孟塞尔测试计分软件”计算。评估的测试镜片是“冰川蓝盾”(Shamir)和“健康保护15”(Eschen- bach),此外还有15%的灰色色调(Hoya)作为参考镜片。用“火焰- s - uv - vis - es”光谱仪(“海洋光学”)预先测量了透镜的透射光谱。结果。采用重复测量的单因素方差分析(ANOVA), Hoya的参考晶状体与Sha- mir的检验晶状体的辨色能力无显著差异(p > 0.05)。与Hoya的参考镜片(p < 0.001)和Shamir的测试镜片(p < 0.001)相比,Eschenbach的“Wellness Protect 15”镜片明显恶化。此外,对于测试镜头和参考镜头,第三个框(色相测试的43 - 63)与所有其他框的中位数差异都被注意到。结论。使用沙米尔的蓝光滤光增透涂层,在本研究中没有观察到颜色辨别的差异。只有像“健康保护15”这样更强的蓝光过滤镜片才会导致视力明显恶化。颜色越接近CIE颜色三角形,混淆就越大。为了测试这些镜片的颜色质量,还应评估显色指数。关键词:蓝光滤光透镜;辨色;显色指数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Der Einfluss von blaulicht­reduzierenden Brillengläsern auf die Farbwahrnehmung
Purpose. To investigate the influence of two different blue- light-filtering lenses on subjective colour perception, using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test. Material and Methods. Thirty subjects with normal colour vision performed the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test wearing three pairs of plano spectacle lenses. The total er- ror score was calculated with the “Farnsworth-Munsell Test Scoring Software“. The evaluated test lenses were the “Glacier Blue Shield“ (Shamir) and the “Wellness Protect 15“ (Eschen- bach) in addition to the 15 % grey tint (Hoya) as a reference lens. The transmission spectra of the lenses were measured beforehand with the spectrometer “Flame-S-UV-VIS-ES“ (“Ocean Optics“). Results. Using the univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, no significant difference could be detected in the colour discrimination capability between the reference lens from Hoya and the test lens from Sha- mir (p > 0.05). A significant deterioration was found with the “Wellness Protect 15“ lens from Eschenbach compared to the reference lens from Hoya (p < 0.001) and to the test lens from Shamir (p < 0.001). In addition, a median disparity of the third box (43 – 63 of the Hue test) against all the other boxes was noticed for both the test lenses and the reference lens. Conclusion. With the blue-light-filtering anti-reflection coating from Shamir no difference in colour discrimination could be observed in this study. Only a stronger blue-light- filtering lens like “Wellness Protect 15“ leads to a significant deterioration. The closer the colours are in the CIE colour triangle, the bigger the confusion. To test the quality of colours with these lenses the colour rendering index should also be evaluated. Keywords Blue-light-filtering lenses, Colour discrimination, Colour perception, Colour Rendering Index, Transmission
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信