C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh
{"title":"表征系统对损害响应的鲁棒方法:传统效用-概率方案的主观(模糊)部分有序修正","authors":"C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.","PeriodicalId":153530,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust methodology for characterizing system response to damage: a subjective (fuzzy) partial ordered modification of the traditional utility-probability scheme\",\"authors\":\"C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robust methodology for characterizing system response to damage: a subjective (fuzzy) partial ordered modification of the traditional utility-probability scheme
To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.