表征系统对损害响应的鲁棒方法:传统效用-概率方案的主观(模糊)部分有序修正

C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh
{"title":"表征系统对损害响应的鲁棒方法:传统效用-概率方案的主观(模糊)部分有序修正","authors":"C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.","PeriodicalId":153530,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust methodology for characterizing system response to damage: a subjective (fuzzy) partial ordered modification of the traditional utility-probability scheme\",\"authors\":\"C. De La Mora, P. Wojciechowski, V. Kreinovich, S. Starks, P. Tanenbaum, A. Kuzminykh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2003.1226820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

为了描述工程复杂系统对各种损伤力学的反应,工程师传统上使用数值效用来描述不同可能结果的结果,并使用(数值)概率(通常是主观概率)来描述不同结果的相对频率。这种描述是基于这样一个假设:专家总是可以在两种可能的结果之间做出明确的偏好,也就是说,所有结果的集合是线性(完全)有序的。在实践中,专家往往不能做出选择,他们的偏好只是部分顺序。本文描述了一种基于偏序的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robust methodology for characterizing system response to damage: a subjective (fuzzy) partial ordered modification of the traditional utility-probability scheme
To describe the response of engineering complex systems to various damage mechanics, engineers have traditionally use number-valued utilities to describe the results of different possible outcomes, and (number-valued) probabilities (often, subjective probabilities) to describe the relative frequency of different outcomes. This description is based on the assumption that experts can always make a definite preference between two possible outcomes, i.e., that the set of all outcomes is linearly (totally) ordered. In practice, experts often cannot make a choice, their preference is only a partial order. In this paper, we describe a new approach based on partial order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信