h桥馈电五相永磁同步电动机控制方法的比较

2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe) Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1109/EPE.2016.7695572

Torben Jonsky, H. Borcherding, P. Szymanski, Jan Wettlaufer, Matthias Theseling

{"title":"h桥馈电五相永磁同步电动机控制方法的比较","authors":"Torben Jonsky, H. Borcherding, P. Szymanski, Jan Wettlaufer, Matthias Theseling","doi":"10.1109/EPE.2016.7695572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three different control methods for a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor are presented and compared to each other. The control schemes include rotor-fixed approaches known as Field Orientated Control and stator-fix approaches like Direct Torque Control and Indirect Self Control. Simulations are carried out and are compared to measurement results.","PeriodicalId":119358,"journal":{"name":"2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of control methods for H-bridge fed five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors\",\"authors\":\"Torben Jonsky, H. Borcherding, P. Szymanski, Jan Wettlaufer, Matthias Theseling\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPE.2016.7695572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three different control methods for a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor are presented and compared to each other. The control schemes include rotor-fixed approaches known as Field Orientated Control and stator-fix approaches like Direct Torque Control and Indirect Self Control. Simulations are carried out and are compared to measurement results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE.2016.7695572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE.2016.7695572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了五相永磁同步电动机的三种不同控制方法，并进行了比较。控制方案包括固定转子的方法，即磁场定向控制和固定定子的方法，如直接转矩控制和间接自控制。进行了仿真，并与实测结果进行了比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of control methods for H-bridge fed five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors

Three different control methods for a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor are presented and compared to each other. The control schemes include rotor-fixed approaches known as Field Orientated Control and stator-fix approaches like Direct Torque Control and Indirect Self Control. Simulations are carried out and are compared to measurement results.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe)

自引率

0.00%

发文量