理解加拿大法律与当代非殖民化运动的定居者-殖民地土地本体之间的关系

Marisa Turner
{"title":"理解加拿大法律与当代非殖民化运动的定居者-殖民地土地本体之间的关系","authors":"Marisa Turner","doi":"10.15664/stalj.v2i1.2465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses a decolonial framework to reveal the power of legality in the settler-colonial states’ legitimation of ontological occupation. Using the 1997 Delgamuukw decision and the Coastal GasLink Pipeline as central case studies, this paper reveals that the historical interrelationship between settler-colonial land ontologies and Canadian law during the process of colonisation has influenced the Canadian court system in ways that limit possibilities for decolonisation, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty. ","PeriodicalId":292385,"journal":{"name":"St Andrews Law Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Relationship between Canadian Law and Settler-Colonial Land Ontologies for Contemporary Decolonisation Movements\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.15664/stalj.v2i1.2465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article uses a decolonial framework to reveal the power of legality in the settler-colonial states’ legitimation of ontological occupation. Using the 1997 Delgamuukw decision and the Coastal GasLink Pipeline as central case studies, this paper reveals that the historical interrelationship between settler-colonial land ontologies and Canadian law during the process of colonisation has influenced the Canadian court system in ways that limit possibilities for decolonisation, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty. \",\"PeriodicalId\":292385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"St Andrews Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"St Andrews Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v2i1.2465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St Andrews Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v2i1.2465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用一个非殖民化的框架来揭示移民-殖民国家对本体论占领的合法性的力量。本文以1997年Delgamuukw决定和沿海天然气管道作为中心案例研究,揭示了殖民过程中定居者-殖民地土地本体与加拿大法律之间的历史相互关系,以限制非殖民化和承认土著主权的可能性的方式影响了加拿大法院系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Relationship between Canadian Law and Settler-Colonial Land Ontologies for Contemporary Decolonisation Movements
This article uses a decolonial framework to reveal the power of legality in the settler-colonial states’ legitimation of ontological occupation. Using the 1997 Delgamuukw decision and the Coastal GasLink Pipeline as central case studies, this paper reveals that the historical interrelationship between settler-colonial land ontologies and Canadian law during the process of colonisation has influenced the Canadian court system in ways that limit possibilities for decolonisation, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信