{"title":"[通过客观决策分析混合前瞻性和回顾性研究的结果:用健康人的思维评估概率?]。","authors":"G Feifel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":77567,"journal":{"name":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","volume":" ","pages":"1309-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Mixing results of prospective and retrospective studies by objective decision analysis: evaluating probability by healthy human minds?].\",\"authors\":\"G Feifel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1309-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Mixing results of prospective and retrospective studies by objective decision analysis: evaluating probability by healthy human minds?].
The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.