[通过客观决策分析混合前瞻性和回顾性研究的结果:用健康人的思维评估概率?]。

G Feifel
{"title":"[通过客观决策分析混合前瞻性和回顾性研究的结果:用健康人的思维评估概率?]。","authors":"G Feifel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":77567,"journal":{"name":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","volume":" ","pages":"1309-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Mixing results of prospective and retrospective studies by objective decision analysis: evaluating probability by healthy human minds?].\",\"authors\":\"G Feifel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1309-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正式决策分析的主要缺点源于临床问题的复杂性、研究者的行为素质和方法本身。似乎很难将研究结果转化为对个体患者问题的概率估计。因此,概率评估应结合医学文献、个人临床经验和数据来源。决策分析本身不是临床现实,但它提供了一个明确思考问题的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Mixing results of prospective and retrospective studies by objective decision analysis: evaluating probability by healthy human minds?].

The major shortcomings of formal decision analysis derive from the complexity of the clinical problem, behavioral qualities of the investigator and the method itself. It seems difficult to translate study results into a probability estimate for the problem in an individual patient. Therefore, probability assessments from the medical literature, one's own clinical experience and data sources should be combined. Decision analysis is not itself clinical reality but provides a model for thinking explicitly about the problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信