没有对立的社会:赫伯特·马尔库塞的单向度人与马克·费雪的资本主义现实主义

N. Power
{"title":"没有对立的社会:赫伯特·马尔库塞的单向度人与马克·费雪的资本主义现实主义","authors":"N. Power","doi":"10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.","PeriodicalId":402397,"journal":{"name":"Radical Philosophy Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Society without Opposition: Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man Meets Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism\",\"authors\":\"N. Power\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Philosophy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图在马尔库塞所谓的“没有对立的社会”的背景下,一起阅读赫伯特·马尔库塞的《单向度的人》和马克·费雪的《资本主义现实主义》。它试图从这两种相当黯淡的分析中提取出希望作为方法的概念。这种共同的希望概念被理解为试图从资本主义是地狱的概念出发,并且无论如何都要继续说话。文章最后捍卫了一个挥之不去的希望概念,而不是一个承诺的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Society without Opposition: Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man Meets Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism
This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信