{"title":"没有对立的社会:赫伯特·马尔库塞的单向度人与马克·费雪的资本主义现实主义","authors":"N. Power","doi":"10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.","PeriodicalId":402397,"journal":{"name":"Radical Philosophy Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Society without Opposition: Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man Meets Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism\",\"authors\":\"N. Power\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Philosophy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201742172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Society without Opposition: Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man Meets Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism
This text seeks to read Herbert Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man and Mark Fisher’s Capitalist Realism together in the context of what Marcuse calls the ‘society without opposition’. It seeks to extract a conception of hope as method from within these two otherwise rather bleak analyses. This shared conception of hope is understood as the attempt to speak from a conception of capitalism as hell, and to continue to speak anyway. The text concludes by defending a conception of hope that haunts rather than a hope that promises.