MVAC海底电缆,阻抗测量和分析

Martin T. Arentsen, Adrian Expethit, M. V. Pedersen, Sebastian B. S⊘rensen, F. Faria da Silva, Dominique A. S⊘rensen
{"title":"MVAC海底电缆,阻抗测量和分析","authors":"Martin T. Arentsen, Adrian Expethit, M. V. Pedersen, Sebastian B. S⊘rensen, F. Faria da Silva, Dominique A. S⊘rensen","doi":"10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to environmental concerns an increase in off-shore windfarms has been observed in recent years, leading to an increased demand for three-core-wire-armoured submarine cables. However, the IEC Standard 60287 used to calculate the ampacity of these cables is widely recognized as being not accurate. Several recent studies have shown that the standard overestimates the cable losses, which results in over-dimensioning the cables and hence higher costs. The studies claim that the over-dimensioning might be due to the collective wire-armour which electromagnetic behaviour is not considered accurately by the standard. This paper investigates the standard inaccuracies, by conducting comprehensive measurements on a three-core-wire-armoured submarine cable. Firstly, DC measurements are conducted in order to investigate the connections between cable components (screen-screen and screens-armour) as this may influence the losses. Secondly, cable parameters such as component impedances, positive-, zero-sequence impedances and losses are measured for varying currents and frequencies. Zero sequence is measured for two setups, one with armour grounded, and with armour open to match CIGREs formula assumption that no currents flows in armour. Finally, the results are compared to a PSCAD model and calculations based on CIGRÉ and IEC formulas. It is found that IEC 60287 overestimates the losses, as expected, but the difference is much smaller than found in other studies. A deviation in the calculation of zero-sequence impedance is found between the measurements and the CIGRÉ formulas. It is concluded that the formulas are not accurate for the specific cable under test.","PeriodicalId":272049,"journal":{"name":"2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MVAC submarine cable, impedance measurements and analysis\",\"authors\":\"Martin T. Arentsen, Adrian Expethit, M. V. Pedersen, Sebastian B. S⊘rensen, F. Faria da Silva, Dominique A. S⊘rensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to environmental concerns an increase in off-shore windfarms has been observed in recent years, leading to an increased demand for three-core-wire-armoured submarine cables. However, the IEC Standard 60287 used to calculate the ampacity of these cables is widely recognized as being not accurate. Several recent studies have shown that the standard overestimates the cable losses, which results in over-dimensioning the cables and hence higher costs. The studies claim that the over-dimensioning might be due to the collective wire-armour which electromagnetic behaviour is not considered accurately by the standard. This paper investigates the standard inaccuracies, by conducting comprehensive measurements on a three-core-wire-armoured submarine cable. Firstly, DC measurements are conducted in order to investigate the connections between cable components (screen-screen and screens-armour) as this may influence the losses. Secondly, cable parameters such as component impedances, positive-, zero-sequence impedances and losses are measured for varying currents and frequencies. Zero sequence is measured for two setups, one with armour grounded, and with armour open to match CIGREs formula assumption that no currents flows in armour. Finally, the results are compared to a PSCAD model and calculations based on CIGRÉ and IEC formulas. It is found that IEC 60287 overestimates the losses, as expected, but the difference is much smaller than found in other studies. A deviation in the calculation of zero-sequence impedance is found between the measurements and the CIGRÉ formulas. It is concluded that the formulas are not accurate for the specific cable under test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

近年来,由于对环境的关注,海上风电场的增加导致对三芯电缆铠装海底电缆的需求增加。然而,用于计算这些电缆的电流的IEC标准60287被广泛认为是不准确的。最近的几项研究表明,该标准高估了电缆损耗,导致电缆尺寸过大,从而导致更高的成本。研究认为,尺寸过大可能是由于标准没有准确考虑电磁行为的集体线铠造成的。本文通过对三芯铠装海底电缆进行综合测量,研究了标准误差。首先,进行直流测量是为了调查电缆组件(屏蔽和屏蔽铠装)之间的连接,因为这可能会影响损耗。其次,在不同的电流和频率下测量电缆参数,如元件阻抗、正序、零序阻抗和损耗。零序列测量了两种设置,一种是装甲接地,另一种是装甲打开,以匹配CIGREs公式假设没有电流流过装甲。最后,将结果与PSCAD模型和基于CIGRÉ和IEC公式的计算结果进行了比较。正如预期的那样,IEC 60287高估了损耗,但差异比其他研究发现的要小得多。零序阻抗的计算结果与CIGRÉ公式存在偏差。结果表明,该公式对于具体的试验电缆是不准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MVAC submarine cable, impedance measurements and analysis
Due to environmental concerns an increase in off-shore windfarms has been observed in recent years, leading to an increased demand for three-core-wire-armoured submarine cables. However, the IEC Standard 60287 used to calculate the ampacity of these cables is widely recognized as being not accurate. Several recent studies have shown that the standard overestimates the cable losses, which results in over-dimensioning the cables and hence higher costs. The studies claim that the over-dimensioning might be due to the collective wire-armour which electromagnetic behaviour is not considered accurately by the standard. This paper investigates the standard inaccuracies, by conducting comprehensive measurements on a three-core-wire-armoured submarine cable. Firstly, DC measurements are conducted in order to investigate the connections between cable components (screen-screen and screens-armour) as this may influence the losses. Secondly, cable parameters such as component impedances, positive-, zero-sequence impedances and losses are measured for varying currents and frequencies. Zero sequence is measured for two setups, one with armour grounded, and with armour open to match CIGREs formula assumption that no currents flows in armour. Finally, the results are compared to a PSCAD model and calculations based on CIGRÉ and IEC formulas. It is found that IEC 60287 overestimates the losses, as expected, but the difference is much smaller than found in other studies. A deviation in the calculation of zero-sequence impedance is found between the measurements and the CIGRÉ formulas. It is concluded that the formulas are not accurate for the specific cable under test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信