通过集体建设项目对自有财产:社会经济和货币因素的分析

Adrian Toschka
{"title":"通过集体建设项目对自有财产:社会经济和货币因素的分析","authors":"Adrian Toschka","doi":"10.15396/eres2019_305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: High rents cause displacement and segregation in German cities, which is why self-used residential property in cities is politically promoted. However, the affordability of homeownership is also declining in cities, which is why, groups of private individuals form private joint building ventures to buy urban vacant land to develop and build multi-family houses for later owner -occupancy. Therefore, it was investigated if private joint construction projects really represent an alternative to buying property from a conventional developer for small and middle-income households.Design/methodology/approach: First, a cluster analysis is performed to identify disparities within the collected financing data of the members of joint building ventures. Second, the typical members of joint building ventures are characterized and compared with data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) using a regression analysis. The evaluation of the data also determines whether the construction costs of joint building projects are relatively low, and whether this makes self-used residential property affordable for households with low and middle income. Findings: The cluster analysis enabled typical groups of people involved in joint building ventures. In conjunction with the subsequent regression analysis, it has been revealed that members of joint construction projetcs are highly homogeneous in terms of formal literacy. However, the comparison with a reference group revealed that the decision for a collective construction project does not depend on the level of net household income. As the projects are partly carried out by non-professional groups, different stakeholders have developed various preconditions through increased professionalization in order to minimize the uncertainty of the construction projects.","PeriodicalId":152375,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To self-owned property through collective construction projects: an analysis of socio-economic and monetary factors\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Toschka\",\"doi\":\"10.15396/eres2019_305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: High rents cause displacement and segregation in German cities, which is why self-used residential property in cities is politically promoted. However, the affordability of homeownership is also declining in cities, which is why, groups of private individuals form private joint building ventures to buy urban vacant land to develop and build multi-family houses for later owner -occupancy. Therefore, it was investigated if private joint construction projects really represent an alternative to buying property from a conventional developer for small and middle-income households.Design/methodology/approach: First, a cluster analysis is performed to identify disparities within the collected financing data of the members of joint building ventures. Second, the typical members of joint building ventures are characterized and compared with data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) using a regression analysis. The evaluation of the data also determines whether the construction costs of joint building projects are relatively low, and whether this makes self-used residential property affordable for households with low and middle income. Findings: The cluster analysis enabled typical groups of people involved in joint building ventures. In conjunction with the subsequent regression analysis, it has been revealed that members of joint construction projetcs are highly homogeneous in terms of formal literacy. However, the comparison with a reference group revealed that the decision for a collective construction project does not depend on the level of net household income. As the projects are partly carried out by non-professional groups, different stakeholders have developed various preconditions through increased professionalization in order to minimize the uncertainty of the construction projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高租金导致德国城市的流离失所和隔离,这就是为什么在城市中自用住宅被政治推动的原因。然而,在城市,拥有住房的负担能力也在下降,这就是为什么私人个人组成私人合资建筑企业,购买城市空地,开发和建造多户住宅,供以后的业主居住。因此,对于中小收入家庭来说,私人联合建设项目是否真的代表了从传统开发商那里购买房产的另一种选择,人们对此进行了调查。设计/方法/方法:首先,进行聚类分析,以确定在所收集的合资建筑企业成员融资数据中的差异。其次,采用回归分析的方法,对合资企业的典型成员进行了特征分析,并与社会经济面板(SOEP)的数据进行了比较。对数据的评估还决定了联合建设项目的建设成本是否相对较低,这是否使中低收入家庭能够负担得起自用住宅。发现:聚类分析使参与合资企业的典型人群成为可能。结合随后的回归分析显示,联合建设项目的成员在正式识字方面是高度同质的。然而,与参考组的比较显示,集体建设项目的决定并不取决于家庭净收入水平。由于项目部分是由非专业团体进行的,不同的利益相关者通过增加专业化制定了各种先决条件,以尽量减少建设项目的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To self-owned property through collective construction projects: an analysis of socio-economic and monetary factors
Purpose: High rents cause displacement and segregation in German cities, which is why self-used residential property in cities is politically promoted. However, the affordability of homeownership is also declining in cities, which is why, groups of private individuals form private joint building ventures to buy urban vacant land to develop and build multi-family houses for later owner -occupancy. Therefore, it was investigated if private joint construction projects really represent an alternative to buying property from a conventional developer for small and middle-income households.Design/methodology/approach: First, a cluster analysis is performed to identify disparities within the collected financing data of the members of joint building ventures. Second, the typical members of joint building ventures are characterized and compared with data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) using a regression analysis. The evaluation of the data also determines whether the construction costs of joint building projects are relatively low, and whether this makes self-used residential property affordable for households with low and middle income. Findings: The cluster analysis enabled typical groups of people involved in joint building ventures. In conjunction with the subsequent regression analysis, it has been revealed that members of joint construction projetcs are highly homogeneous in terms of formal literacy. However, the comparison with a reference group revealed that the decision for a collective construction project does not depend on the level of net household income. As the projects are partly carried out by non-professional groups, different stakeholders have developed various preconditions through increased professionalization in order to minimize the uncertainty of the construction projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信