{"title":"语音变体的选择:人机性能比较","authors":"J. Kessens, M. Wester, C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik","doi":"10.21437/ICSLP.1998-604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the performance of an automatic transcription tool is evaluated. The transcription tool is a Continuous Speech Recognizer (CSR) running in forced recognition mode. For evaluation the performance of the CSR was compared to that of nine expert listeners. Both man and the machine carried out exactly the same task: deciding whether a segment was present or not in 467 cases. It turned out that the performance of the CSR is comparable to that of the experts.","PeriodicalId":117113,"journal":{"name":"5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The selection of pronunciation variants: comparing the performance of man and machine\",\"authors\":\"J. Kessens, M. Wester, C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik\",\"doi\":\"10.21437/ICSLP.1998-604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the performance of an automatic transcription tool is evaluated. The transcription tool is a Continuous Speech Recognizer (CSR) running in forced recognition mode. For evaluation the performance of the CSR was compared to that of nine expert listeners. Both man and the machine carried out exactly the same task: deciding whether a segment was present or not in 467 cases. It turned out that the performance of the CSR is comparable to that of the experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The selection of pronunciation variants: comparing the performance of man and machine
In this paper the performance of an automatic transcription tool is evaluated. The transcription tool is a Continuous Speech Recognizer (CSR) running in forced recognition mode. For evaluation the performance of the CSR was compared to that of nine expert listeners. Both man and the machine carried out exactly the same task: deciding whether a segment was present or not in 467 cases. It turned out that the performance of the CSR is comparable to that of the experts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
