{"title":"对营业收入的看法","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 122 S. Ct. 1465, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3028 (2002) is the latest1, but certainly not the final, word in the takings debate. We've invited nine land-use attorneys with a wide range of viewpoints to share their insights, musings, and (in some cases) frustrations about the Tahoe-Sierra decision. From the advocate for the Tahoe landowners (Michael M. Berger) to the General Counsel for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (John Marshall), we have a diversity of opinions that illustrate the complexity of the issue. There is no easy answer to the question: “When does a regulation go too far?”","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Take on Takings\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 122 S. Ct. 1465, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3028 (2002) is the latest1, but certainly not the final, word in the takings debate. We've invited nine land-use attorneys with a wide range of viewpoints to share their insights, musings, and (in some cases) frustrations about the Tahoe-Sierra decision. From the advocate for the Tahoe landowners (Michael M. Berger) to the General Counsel for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (John Marshall), we have a diversity of opinions that illustrate the complexity of the issue. There is no easy answer to the question: “When does a regulation go too far?”\",\"PeriodicalId\":154411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近，美国最高法院在“塔霍-塞拉保护委员会公司诉塔霍地区规划机构”一案(2002年，122 S. Ct. 1465)中作出的判决是关于征收辩论的最新判决，但肯定不是最后判决。我们邀请了九位具有广泛观点的土地使用律师来分享他们对Tahoe-Sierra决定的见解，思考和(在某些情况下)挫折感。从太浩土地所有者的倡导者(迈克尔·m·伯杰)到太浩地区规划局的总法律顾问(约翰·马歇尔)，我们有各种各样的意见，说明了这个问题的复杂性。要回答这个问题并不容易:“什么时候一项监管会走得太远?”
Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 122 S. Ct. 1465, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3028 (2002) is the latest1, but certainly not the final, word in the takings debate. We've invited nine land-use attorneys with a wide range of viewpoints to share their insights, musings, and (in some cases) frustrations about the Tahoe-Sierra decision. From the advocate for the Tahoe landowners (Michael M. Berger) to the General Counsel for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (John Marshall), we have a diversity of opinions that illustrate the complexity of the issue. There is no easy answer to the question: “When does a regulation go too far?”
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
