胃肠道癌患者的营养风险:诊断方法

Ingrid Dalira Schweigert Perry, Luana Stangherlin, Taíse Pedroso de Barros, Ângela Martinha Bongiolo, M. Silva, Kamila Castro, L. Ceretta
{"title":"胃肠道癌患者的营养风险:诊断方法","authors":"Ingrid Dalira Schweigert Perry, Luana Stangherlin, Taíse Pedroso de Barros, Ângela Martinha Bongiolo, M. Silva, Kamila Castro, L. Ceretta","doi":"10.15448/1983-652X.2018.4.27289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cancer is a problem of major public health impact, especially in developing countries. Objective: To evaluate the risk of malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer and the effectiveness of diagnostic methods compared to the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 148 patients admitted to the hospital Sao Jose, Criciuma, Santa Catarina. Patients were evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire, body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, arm circumference and arm muscle area. Results: According to Subjective Global Assessment, 47.3% were in risk of malnutrition and 20.9% in severe malnutrition. Body mass index was significantly higher in patients classified as well-nourished; arm muscle area was lower in patients classified as malnourished; arm circumference showed discriminatory capacity for well-nourished patients; there was no difference in the averages of the triceps skinfold thickness according to Subjective Global Assessment classification; the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire showed lower scores in malnourished male patients, compared to patients at risk of malnutrition as well as to well nourished. Conclusion: With the exception of the triceps skinfold thickness, there is discriminatory capacity for well-nourished and malnourished classifications, and between well-nourished and nutritional risk in all other methods (arm circumference and area, body mass index and the appetite questionnaire). Among the three classifications (well nourished, at nutritional risk and malnourished), there is discriminatory capacity for the body mass index, arm circumference and the nutritional appetite questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":193622,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Saúde","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risco nutricional em pacientes com câncer do trato gastrointestinal: métodos diagnósticos\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Dalira Schweigert Perry, Luana Stangherlin, Taíse Pedroso de Barros, Ângela Martinha Bongiolo, M. Silva, Kamila Castro, L. Ceretta\",\"doi\":\"10.15448/1983-652X.2018.4.27289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cancer is a problem of major public health impact, especially in developing countries. Objective: To evaluate the risk of malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer and the effectiveness of diagnostic methods compared to the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 148 patients admitted to the hospital Sao Jose, Criciuma, Santa Catarina. Patients were evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire, body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, arm circumference and arm muscle area. Results: According to Subjective Global Assessment, 47.3% were in risk of malnutrition and 20.9% in severe malnutrition. Body mass index was significantly higher in patients classified as well-nourished; arm muscle area was lower in patients classified as malnourished; arm circumference showed discriminatory capacity for well-nourished patients; there was no difference in the averages of the triceps skinfold thickness according to Subjective Global Assessment classification; the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire showed lower scores in malnourished male patients, compared to patients at risk of malnutrition as well as to well nourished. Conclusion: With the exception of the triceps skinfold thickness, there is discriminatory capacity for well-nourished and malnourished classifications, and between well-nourished and nutritional risk in all other methods (arm circumference and area, body mass index and the appetite questionnaire). Among the three classifications (well nourished, at nutritional risk and malnourished), there is discriminatory capacity for the body mass index, arm circumference and the nutritional appetite questionnaire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciência & Saúde\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciência & Saúde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2018.4.27289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Saúde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2018.4.27289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:癌症是一个影响公共卫生的重大问题,特别是在发展中国家。目的:评价胃肠道肿瘤患者营养不良的风险及诊断方法与患者主观综合评估的有效性。材料与方法:对圣卡塔琳娜圣荷西克里丘马医院收治的148例患者进行横断面研究。采用患者主观整体评估法对患者进行评估。简易营养食欲问卷、体重指数、肱三头肌皮褶厚度、臂围、臂肌面积。结果:根据主观综合评价,有营养不良危险的占47.3%,严重营养不良的占20.9%。营养良好的患者体重指数明显较高;被归类为营养不良的患者手臂肌肉面积较低;臂围对营养良好的患者表现出歧视性;主观综合评价法评定三头肌皮褶厚度的平均值无显著性差异;简化营养食欲问卷显示,与营养不良风险患者和营养良好患者相比,营养不良男性患者的得分较低。结论:除肱三头肌皮褶厚度外,其他所有方法(臂围及面积、体重指数和食欲问卷)均存在营养良好和营养不良分类的区别,营养良好和营养风险之间也存在区别。在三种分类(营养良好、有营养风险和营养不良)中,体重指数、臂围和营养食欲问卷具有歧视性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risco nutricional em pacientes com câncer do trato gastrointestinal: métodos diagnósticos
Introduction: Cancer is a problem of major public health impact, especially in developing countries. Objective: To evaluate the risk of malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer and the effectiveness of diagnostic methods compared to the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 148 patients admitted to the hospital Sao Jose, Criciuma, Santa Catarina. Patients were evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire, body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, arm circumference and arm muscle area. Results: According to Subjective Global Assessment, 47.3% were in risk of malnutrition and 20.9% in severe malnutrition. Body mass index was significantly higher in patients classified as well-nourished; arm muscle area was lower in patients classified as malnourished; arm circumference showed discriminatory capacity for well-nourished patients; there was no difference in the averages of the triceps skinfold thickness according to Subjective Global Assessment classification; the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire showed lower scores in malnourished male patients, compared to patients at risk of malnutrition as well as to well nourished. Conclusion: With the exception of the triceps skinfold thickness, there is discriminatory capacity for well-nourished and malnourished classifications, and between well-nourished and nutritional risk in all other methods (arm circumference and area, body mass index and the appetite questionnaire). Among the three classifications (well nourished, at nutritional risk and malnourished), there is discriminatory capacity for the body mass index, arm circumference and the nutritional appetite questionnaire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信