{"title":"《管理信息系统的战略规划》,作者:Ephraim R. McLean & John V. SodenWiley-Interscience 1977","authors":"Gene Altshuler","doi":"10.1145/1040710.1040716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With all my prejudices showing, I approached Strategic Planning for MIS. When the book was presented to me for review, I was told that it was a collection of selected readings. This caused me to want to reject it out-of-hand, for I could not stomach another collection of essays or monographs, connected loosely with an all-encompassing title, and where the editors, at best, appended a hundred words or so at the beginning of each chapter alleging to put it into context. I felt I could not psych myself up to struggle through a dozen different styles of writing, often times photo-reproduced from the original, thus displaying a dozen different type fonts replete with hand-drawn diagrams. I just was not in the mood for another \"cheap shot\" at a book by two editors.","PeriodicalId":152518,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigmis Database","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of \\\"Strategic Planning for MIS, by Ephraim R. McLean & John V. Soden\\\"; Wiley-Interscience, 1977\",\"authors\":\"Gene Altshuler\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1040710.1040716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With all my prejudices showing, I approached Strategic Planning for MIS. When the book was presented to me for review, I was told that it was a collection of selected readings. This caused me to want to reject it out-of-hand, for I could not stomach another collection of essays or monographs, connected loosely with an all-encompassing title, and where the editors, at best, appended a hundred words or so at the beginning of each chapter alleging to put it into context. I felt I could not psych myself up to struggle through a dozen different styles of writing, often times photo-reproduced from the original, thus displaying a dozen different type fonts replete with hand-drawn diagrams. I just was not in the mood for another \\\"cheap shot\\\" at a book by two editors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigmis Database\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigmis Database\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1040710.1040716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigmis Database","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1040710.1040716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of "Strategic Planning for MIS, by Ephraim R. McLean & John V. Soden"; Wiley-Interscience, 1977
With all my prejudices showing, I approached Strategic Planning for MIS. When the book was presented to me for review, I was told that it was a collection of selected readings. This caused me to want to reject it out-of-hand, for I could not stomach another collection of essays or monographs, connected loosely with an all-encompassing title, and where the editors, at best, appended a hundred words or so at the beginning of each chapter alleging to put it into context. I felt I could not psych myself up to struggle through a dozen different styles of writing, often times photo-reproduced from the original, thus displaying a dozen different type fonts replete with hand-drawn diagrams. I just was not in the mood for another "cheap shot" at a book by two editors.