商贸力量

{"title":"商贸力量","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/9781108658348.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The constitutional concept of a “valid regulatory scheme” is part of the arsenal of techniques constitutional law utilizes to overcome the difficulties of divided jurisdiction in a federal state. That being said, there has been surprisingly little pronouncement on what “constitutes a regulatory scheme”. This is even more surprising when one considers that a “regulatory scheme” is also required in the context of indirect tax. However, by examining the factual context of all of the trade and commerce and taxation cases, it may be seen that certain characteristics are present whenever a regulatory scheme exists.","PeriodicalId":153109,"journal":{"name":"Australian Constitutional Law","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade and Commerce Power\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108658348.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The constitutional concept of a “valid regulatory scheme” is part of the arsenal of techniques constitutional law utilizes to overcome the difficulties of divided jurisdiction in a federal state. That being said, there has been surprisingly little pronouncement on what “constitutes a regulatory scheme”. This is even more surprising when one considers that a “regulatory scheme” is also required in the context of indirect tax. However, by examining the factual context of all of the trade and commerce and taxation cases, it may be seen that certain characteristics are present whenever a regulatory scheme exists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108658348.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108658348.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法中“有效监管计划”的概念是宪法用来克服联邦制国家管辖权划分困难的一系列技术的一部分。话虽如此,但令人惊讶的是,关于什么是“监管计划”的声明却寥寥无几。如果考虑到间接税也需要“监管计划”,这就更令人惊讶了。然而,通过审查所有贸易、商业和税务案件的事实背景,可以看出,只要存在管制计划,就会出现某些特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trade and Commerce Power
The constitutional concept of a “valid regulatory scheme” is part of the arsenal of techniques constitutional law utilizes to overcome the difficulties of divided jurisdiction in a federal state. That being said, there has been surprisingly little pronouncement on what “constitutes a regulatory scheme”. This is even more surprising when one considers that a “regulatory scheme” is also required in the context of indirect tax. However, by examining the factual context of all of the trade and commerce and taxation cases, it may be seen that certain characteristics are present whenever a regulatory scheme exists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信