为全球发展中国家重新设计基本实验室信息系统

Jung Wook Park, Aditi Shah, R. Arriaga, S. Vempala
{"title":"为全球发展中国家重新设计基本实验室信息系统","authors":"Jung Wook Park, Aditi Shah, R. Arriaga, S. Vempala","doi":"10.23919/ITUK48006.2019.8995907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laboratory information systems (LIS) optimize information storage and processing for clinics and hospitals. In the recent past, developers of LIS for the global south have worked under the assumption that computing environments will be very limited. However, the computing resources in the area have been rapidly enriched. This has also changed the expectations that users have about the LIS interface and functionality. In this paper, we provide a case study of C4G BLIS that has been in operation for nearly a decade in seven African countries. In two studies that included 51 participants from three African countries, we redesigned the LIS to better suit the changing technical landscape and user needs and evaluated the new design. The study procedure, usability metrics and lessons learned from our evaluation provide a model that other researchers can use. The findings provide empirical insights that can benefit designers and developers of LIS in the global south. The results also highlight the need for adding usability specifications for international standard organizations.","PeriodicalId":289226,"journal":{"name":"2019 ITU Kaleidoscope: ICT for Health: Networks, Standards and Innovation (ITU K)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning a Basic Laboratory Information System for the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Jung Wook Park, Aditi Shah, R. Arriaga, S. Vempala\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ITUK48006.2019.8995907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laboratory information systems (LIS) optimize information storage and processing for clinics and hospitals. In the recent past, developers of LIS for the global south have worked under the assumption that computing environments will be very limited. However, the computing resources in the area have been rapidly enriched. This has also changed the expectations that users have about the LIS interface and functionality. In this paper, we provide a case study of C4G BLIS that has been in operation for nearly a decade in seven African countries. In two studies that included 51 participants from three African countries, we redesigned the LIS to better suit the changing technical landscape and user needs and evaluated the new design. The study procedure, usability metrics and lessons learned from our evaluation provide a model that other researchers can use. The findings provide empirical insights that can benefit designers and developers of LIS in the global south. The results also highlight the need for adding usability specifications for international standard organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 ITU Kaleidoscope: ICT for Health: Networks, Standards and Innovation (ITU K)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 ITU Kaleidoscope: ICT for Health: Networks, Standards and Innovation (ITU K)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ITUK48006.2019.8995907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 ITU Kaleidoscope: ICT for Health: Networks, Standards and Innovation (ITU K)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ITUK48006.2019.8995907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验室信息系统(LIS)优化了诊所和医院的信息存储和处理。在最近的过去,全球南部的LIS开发人员一直在假设计算环境将非常有限的情况下工作。然而,该地区的计算资源已经迅速丰富起来。这也改变了用户对LIS界面和功能的期望。在本文中,我们提供了一个在七个非洲国家已经运行了近十年的C4G BLIS的案例研究。在包括来自三个非洲国家的51名参与者的两项研究中,我们重新设计了LIS,以更好地适应不断变化的技术环境和用户需求,并评估了新设计。研究过程、可用性指标和从我们的评估中获得的经验教训为其他研究人员提供了一个可以使用的模型。研究结果提供了经验见解,可以使全球南方的LIS设计师和开发人员受益。结果还强调了为国际标准组织添加可用性规范的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redesigning a Basic Laboratory Information System for the Global South
Laboratory information systems (LIS) optimize information storage and processing for clinics and hospitals. In the recent past, developers of LIS for the global south have worked under the assumption that computing environments will be very limited. However, the computing resources in the area have been rapidly enriched. This has also changed the expectations that users have about the LIS interface and functionality. In this paper, we provide a case study of C4G BLIS that has been in operation for nearly a decade in seven African countries. In two studies that included 51 participants from three African countries, we redesigned the LIS to better suit the changing technical landscape and user needs and evaluated the new design. The study procedure, usability metrics and lessons learned from our evaluation provide a model that other researchers can use. The findings provide empirical insights that can benefit designers and developers of LIS in the global south. The results also highlight the need for adding usability specifications for international standard organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信