不同拓扑合成技术下32nm MD5加密处理器的实现及与500nm节点的比较

Juan J. Jiménez, André Borja, Laetitia Silly, L. Prócel, L. Trojman, R. Taco
{"title":"不同拓扑合成技术下32nm MD5加密处理器的实现及与500nm节点的比较","authors":"Juan J. Jiménez, André Borja, Laetitia Silly, L. Prócel, L. Trojman, R. Taco","doi":"10.1109/ETCM53643.2021.9590739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work focuses on several synthetizations developed in both 32nm and 500nm technologies to evaluate the performance differences of MD5 Crypto-Processor. We decided to conduct a topographical synthesis instead of a nontopographical synthesis as it takes more parameters into account to create a more accurate design. We started by comparing some basic cells like inverters and register banks to understand the main differences between the two technologies. Several approaches were considered at this point to understand how different synthetization parameters affect the chip performance and characteristics. These different approaches were focused on time, power and area, and balanced configurations of synthesis flow. Finally, after comparing the performance given by the different approaches in basic digital structures, the balanced approach was implemented in 32nm and benchmarked with the 500nm implementation. Our conclusions were consistent among the various tests conducted and by downscaling we can expect a 10x increase in the clock frequency, a 100x decrease in power consumption, and around a 300x decrease in the area while using the 32nm technology. As a result, we developed a method to fairly compare complex systems to allow a designer to consider if the benefits justify the costs for a technology change.","PeriodicalId":438567,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Fifth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of 32nm MD5 Crypto-Processor using Different Topographical Synthesis Techniques and Comparison with 500nm Node\",\"authors\":\"Juan J. Jiménez, André Borja, Laetitia Silly, L. Prócel, L. Trojman, R. Taco\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETCM53643.2021.9590739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work focuses on several synthetizations developed in both 32nm and 500nm technologies to evaluate the performance differences of MD5 Crypto-Processor. We decided to conduct a topographical synthesis instead of a nontopographical synthesis as it takes more parameters into account to create a more accurate design. We started by comparing some basic cells like inverters and register banks to understand the main differences between the two technologies. Several approaches were considered at this point to understand how different synthetization parameters affect the chip performance and characteristics. These different approaches were focused on time, power and area, and balanced configurations of synthesis flow. Finally, after comparing the performance given by the different approaches in basic digital structures, the balanced approach was implemented in 32nm and benchmarked with the 500nm implementation. Our conclusions were consistent among the various tests conducted and by downscaling we can expect a 10x increase in the clock frequency, a 100x decrease in power consumption, and around a 300x decrease in the area while using the 32nm technology. As a result, we developed a method to fairly compare complex systems to allow a designer to consider if the benefits justify the costs for a technology change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Fifth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Fifth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM53643.2021.9590739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Fifth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM53643.2021.9590739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究了在32nm和500nm技术下开发的几种合成方法,以评估MD5加密处理器的性能差异。我们决定进行地形综合而不是非地形综合,因为它需要考虑更多的参数来创建更精确的设计。我们首先比较了一些基本单元,如逆变器和寄存器库,以了解两种技术之间的主要区别。在这一点上,考虑了几种方法来了解不同的合成参数如何影响芯片的性能和特性。这些不同的方法集中在时间、功率和面积上,以及合成流程的平衡配置。最后,在比较了不同方法在基本数字结构中的性能之后,平衡方法在32nm实现,并与500nm实现进行了基准测试。我们的结论在进行的各种测试中是一致的,通过缩小尺寸,我们可以预期时钟频率增加10倍,功耗降低100倍,在使用32nm技术时,面积减少约300倍。因此,我们开发了一种方法来公平地比较复杂的系统,以允许设计师考虑是否利益证明技术变更的成本是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of 32nm MD5 Crypto-Processor using Different Topographical Synthesis Techniques and Comparison with 500nm Node
This work focuses on several synthetizations developed in both 32nm and 500nm technologies to evaluate the performance differences of MD5 Crypto-Processor. We decided to conduct a topographical synthesis instead of a nontopographical synthesis as it takes more parameters into account to create a more accurate design. We started by comparing some basic cells like inverters and register banks to understand the main differences between the two technologies. Several approaches were considered at this point to understand how different synthetization parameters affect the chip performance and characteristics. These different approaches were focused on time, power and area, and balanced configurations of synthesis flow. Finally, after comparing the performance given by the different approaches in basic digital structures, the balanced approach was implemented in 32nm and benchmarked with the 500nm implementation. Our conclusions were consistent among the various tests conducted and by downscaling we can expect a 10x increase in the clock frequency, a 100x decrease in power consumption, and around a 300x decrease in the area while using the 32nm technology. As a result, we developed a method to fairly compare complex systems to allow a designer to consider if the benefits justify the costs for a technology change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信