异丙酚麻醉对大鼠皮瓣存活的影响氯胺酮的比较

A. R. Jahromi, A. T. Naeini, S. Nazifi, Z. Seif
{"title":"异丙酚麻醉对大鼠皮瓣存活的影响氯胺酮的比较","authors":"A. R. Jahromi, A. T. Naeini, S. Nazifi, Z. Seif","doi":"10.29252/JMJ.14.4.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate non-anesthetic properties of propofol in skin flap survival in rats. Materials and methods: Thirty-two adult white female rats were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was anesthesized with ketamine (40 mg/kg) and group 2 was anesthesized with propofol (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. A full-thickness piece of skin on the back of rats (2.5 × 8 × 8 cm) was incised while the flap base was preserved. The flap was immediately returned and sutured using 5.0 separate sutures to the original location. Apparent healing was daily assessed by measuring the necrotic and healthy areas and the survival rate of the skin flaps was evaluated after photography. Histopathological evaluation was performed by a blinded pathologist on days 1, 4, 7 and 21 in three zones of the flap: up, down and middle. Serum interleukin 1 and 6 were measured before and 12, 24 and 168 hours after creating the flaps. Results: Flap survival rate on day 21, and IL-6 on day 0, 12 hour and day 1 were significantly higher in propofol group than in ketamine group. IL-1 was not significantly different. Histological signs of healing were more prominent in propofol group. Conclusion: It appears that propofol has a more significant effect on skin flap survival in comparison with ketamine, but further and more precise studies are required to confirm this finding.","PeriodicalId":263834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of propofol anesthesia on skin flap survival in rat; comparison with ketamine\",\"authors\":\"A. R. Jahromi, A. T. Naeini, S. Nazifi, Z. Seif\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/JMJ.14.4.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate non-anesthetic properties of propofol in skin flap survival in rats. Materials and methods: Thirty-two adult white female rats were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was anesthesized with ketamine (40 mg/kg) and group 2 was anesthesized with propofol (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. A full-thickness piece of skin on the back of rats (2.5 × 8 × 8 cm) was incised while the flap base was preserved. The flap was immediately returned and sutured using 5.0 separate sutures to the original location. Apparent healing was daily assessed by measuring the necrotic and healthy areas and the survival rate of the skin flaps was evaluated after photography. Histopathological evaluation was performed by a blinded pathologist on days 1, 4, 7 and 21 in three zones of the flap: up, down and middle. Serum interleukin 1 and 6 were measured before and 12, 24 and 168 hours after creating the flaps. Results: Flap survival rate on day 21, and IL-6 on day 0, 12 hour and day 1 were significantly higher in propofol group than in ketamine group. IL-1 was not significantly different. Histological signs of healing were more prominent in propofol group. Conclusion: It appears that propofol has a more significant effect on skin flap survival in comparison with ketamine, but further and more precise studies are required to confirm this finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMJ.14.4.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMJ.14.4.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价异丙酚对大鼠皮瓣存活的非麻醉特性。材料与方法:32只成年雌性白种大鼠随机分为两组。1组采用氯胺酮(40 mg/kg)腹腔麻醉,2组采用异丙酚(100 mg/kg)腹腔麻醉。取大鼠背部全层皮肤(2.5 × 8 × 8 cm),保留皮瓣基部。立即将皮瓣退回,并使用5.0个单独的缝合线将皮瓣缝合到原始位置。每日通过测量坏死和健康区域评估表观愈合,摄影后评估皮瓣存活率。由盲法病理学家于第1、4、7和21天对皮瓣的上、下、中三个区域进行组织病理学评估。血清白细胞介素1和6分别于皮瓣制作前、12、24和168小时测定。结果:异丙酚组皮瓣第21天存活率、第0天、第12小时及第1天IL-6显著高于氯胺酮组。IL-1差异无统计学意义。异丙酚组愈合的组织学征象更为明显。结论:与氯胺酮相比,异丙酚对皮瓣存活的影响似乎更显著,但需要进一步更精确的研究来证实这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of propofol anesthesia on skin flap survival in rat; comparison with ketamine
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate non-anesthetic properties of propofol in skin flap survival in rats. Materials and methods: Thirty-two adult white female rats were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was anesthesized with ketamine (40 mg/kg) and group 2 was anesthesized with propofol (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. A full-thickness piece of skin on the back of rats (2.5 × 8 × 8 cm) was incised while the flap base was preserved. The flap was immediately returned and sutured using 5.0 separate sutures to the original location. Apparent healing was daily assessed by measuring the necrotic and healthy areas and the survival rate of the skin flaps was evaluated after photography. Histopathological evaluation was performed by a blinded pathologist on days 1, 4, 7 and 21 in three zones of the flap: up, down and middle. Serum interleukin 1 and 6 were measured before and 12, 24 and 168 hours after creating the flaps. Results: Flap survival rate on day 21, and IL-6 on day 0, 12 hour and day 1 were significantly higher in propofol group than in ketamine group. IL-1 was not significantly different. Histological signs of healing were more prominent in propofol group. Conclusion: It appears that propofol has a more significant effect on skin flap survival in comparison with ketamine, but further and more precise studies are required to confirm this finding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信