元检测分析

Shiwan Hu
{"title":"元检测分析","authors":"Shiwan Hu","doi":"10.1002/9781119584254.ch18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Number of studies have been performed to evaluate the relationship between the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk, but the sample size was small and the results were conflicting. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the overall association. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China Biology Medical Literature database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Weipu databases were searched before July 31, 2018. The strength of associations was assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All of the statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results:Eleven studies involved 3899 cases and 4608 controls. Overall, significant association was observed between theCTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer (T vs C: OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.12–1.76; TT vs CC: OR=2.22, 95% CI= 1.13–4.37; TT vs CT+CC: OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.03–3.74; TT+CT vs CC: OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.14–1.90). In subgroup analysis by ethnic group, a statistically significant association was observed in Asians (T vs C: OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.22–1.99), but not in Caucasians (T vs C: OR=1.19, 95% CI=0.87–1.62). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability and stability of the metaanalysis. Conclusion: our meta-analysis supports that the CTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism might contribute to individual susceptibility to cervical cancer in Asians. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CTLA-4 = cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4, HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa scale, OR = odds ratio, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, PCR-RFLP = polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.","PeriodicalId":267632,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics Decoded","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta‐analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shiwan Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781119584254.ch18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Number of studies have been performed to evaluate the relationship between the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk, but the sample size was small and the results were conflicting. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the overall association. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China Biology Medical Literature database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Weipu databases were searched before July 31, 2018. The strength of associations was assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All of the statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results:Eleven studies involved 3899 cases and 4608 controls. Overall, significant association was observed between theCTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer (T vs C: OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.12–1.76; TT vs CC: OR=2.22, 95% CI= 1.13–4.37; TT vs CT+CC: OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.03–3.74; TT+CT vs CC: OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.14–1.90). In subgroup analysis by ethnic group, a statistically significant association was observed in Asians (T vs C: OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.22–1.99), but not in Caucasians (T vs C: OR=1.19, 95% CI=0.87–1.62). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability and stability of the metaanalysis. Conclusion: our meta-analysis supports that the CTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism might contribute to individual susceptibility to cervical cancer in Asians. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CTLA-4 = cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4, HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa scale, OR = odds ratio, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, PCR-RFLP = polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biostatistics Decoded\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biostatistics Decoded\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119584254.ch18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics Decoded","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119584254.ch18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于细胞毒性t淋巴细胞相关抗原-4 (CTLA-4)基因变异rs5742909多态性与宫颈癌风险关系的研究较多,但样本量小,结果矛盾。本荟萃分析是为了全面评估两者之间的总体关联。方法:检索2018年7月31日前的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国国家知识基础设施数据库、万方数据库、卫普数据库。使用比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)评估关联强度。所有统计分析均使用Review Manager 5.3和Stata 14.0进行。结果:11项研究涉及3899例病例和4608例对照。总体而言,ctla -4基因变异rs5742909多态性与宫颈癌之间存在显著相关性(T vs C: OR=1.40, 95% CI= 1.12-1.76;TT vs CC: OR=2.22, 95% CI= 1.13-4.37;TT vs CT+CC: OR=1.96, 95% CI= 1.03-3.74;TT+CT vs CC: OR=1.47, 95% CI= 1.14-1.90)。在种族亚组分析中,亚洲人(T vs C: OR=1.56, 95% CI= 1.22-1.99)的相关性具有统计学意义,但在白种人(T vs C: OR=1.19, 95% CI= 0.87-1.62)中无统计学意义。敏感性分析证实了meta分析的可靠性和稳定性。结论:我们的荟萃分析支持CTLA-4基因变异rs5742909多态性可能与亚洲人宫颈癌的个体易感性有关。缩写:CI =置信区间,CTLA-4 =细胞毒性t淋巴细胞相关抗原-4,HWE = Hardy-Weinberg平衡,NOS =纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,OR =优势比,PCR =聚合酶链反应,PCR- rflp =聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性,SNP =单核苷酸多态性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta‐analysis
Background: Number of studies have been performed to evaluate the relationship between the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk, but the sample size was small and the results were conflicting. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the overall association. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China Biology Medical Literature database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Weipu databases were searched before July 31, 2018. The strength of associations was assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All of the statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results:Eleven studies involved 3899 cases and 4608 controls. Overall, significant association was observed between theCTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism and cervical cancer (T vs C: OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.12–1.76; TT vs CC: OR=2.22, 95% CI= 1.13–4.37; TT vs CT+CC: OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.03–3.74; TT+CT vs CC: OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.14–1.90). In subgroup analysis by ethnic group, a statistically significant association was observed in Asians (T vs C: OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.22–1.99), but not in Caucasians (T vs C: OR=1.19, 95% CI=0.87–1.62). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability and stability of the metaanalysis. Conclusion: our meta-analysis supports that the CTLA-4 gene variant rs5742909 polymorphism might contribute to individual susceptibility to cervical cancer in Asians. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CTLA-4 = cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4, HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa scale, OR = odds ratio, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, PCR-RFLP = polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信