{"title":"用户与自动驾驶微型车辆的通信偏好","authors":"Vivian Lotz, Eva-Maria Schomakers, M. Ziefle","doi":"10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of automation in road traffic, vehicle interaction design is undergoing a major shift and facing new challenges. In this paper, we adopted a user-centered design approach to identify suitable interface types for the interaction between automated light vehicles for urban last-mile deliveries and their human operator. In an exploratory co-creation workshop, we first identified possible interface types with laypeople and logistics employees (N=8). Based on the workshop insights, we surveyed user acceptance of various interface options (e.g., app, voice, and gesture control), the situation- and user-dependency of interface acceptance, and the users’ motivations for preferring specific interface types (online survey study: N=188). The analysis revealed that ease of use, road safety, and compatibility were the most mentioned reasons for preferring a particular interface type. Additionally, results showed that app and voice control were, on average, perceived as most desirable. However, none of the queried interface types was assessed as a perfect fit for each interaction situation and user.","PeriodicalId":184622,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users’ Preferences for the Communication with Autonomous Micro-Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Vivian Lotz, Eva-Maria Schomakers, M. Ziefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of automation in road traffic, vehicle interaction design is undergoing a major shift and facing new challenges. In this paper, we adopted a user-centered design approach to identify suitable interface types for the interaction between automated light vehicles for urban last-mile deliveries and their human operator. In an exploratory co-creation workshop, we first identified possible interface types with laypeople and logistics employees (N=8). Based on the workshop insights, we surveyed user acceptance of various interface options (e.g., app, voice, and gesture control), the situation- and user-dependency of interface acceptance, and the users’ motivations for preferring specific interface types (online survey study: N=188). The analysis revealed that ease of use, road safety, and compatibility were the most mentioned reasons for preferring a particular interface type. Additionally, results showed that app and voice control were, on average, perceived as most desirable. However, none of the queried interface types was assessed as a perfect fit for each interaction situation and user.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Users’ Preferences for the Communication with Autonomous Micro-Vehicles
With the advent of automation in road traffic, vehicle interaction design is undergoing a major shift and facing new challenges. In this paper, we adopted a user-centered design approach to identify suitable interface types for the interaction between automated light vehicles for urban last-mile deliveries and their human operator. In an exploratory co-creation workshop, we first identified possible interface types with laypeople and logistics employees (N=8). Based on the workshop insights, we surveyed user acceptance of various interface options (e.g., app, voice, and gesture control), the situation- and user-dependency of interface acceptance, and the users’ motivations for preferring specific interface types (online survey study: N=188). The analysis revealed that ease of use, road safety, and compatibility were the most mentioned reasons for preferring a particular interface type. Additionally, results showed that app and voice control were, on average, perceived as most desirable. However, none of the queried interface types was assessed as a perfect fit for each interaction situation and user.