高分辨率模型的多尺度油藏模拟

J. Natvig, Daniel Dias, F. Bratvedt, Shingo Watanabe, Zhuoyi Li, Antonina Kozlova, P. Tomin, Jiamin Jiang, Xundan Shi
{"title":"高分辨率模型的多尺度油藏模拟","authors":"J. Natvig, Daniel Dias, F. Bratvedt, Shingo Watanabe, Zhuoyi Li, Antonina Kozlova, P. Tomin, Jiamin Jiang, Xundan Shi","doi":"10.2118/212231-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To quantify the uncertainty in reservoir performance, it is common to build ensembles of models that sample the space of possible reservoirs that are consistent with the available data. To evaluate the spread of possible outcomes, simulations experiments are run for each model in the ensemble to calculate for instance recovery factor. The geoscreening workflow is a common way to do this systematically and in a reasonable time. It can work as follows: First, run simulations with simplified physics to calculate recovery factor for every model in the ensemble. Then, use recovery factor (and other quantities) to rank and select representative models for high, medium, and low performance scenarios that can be used for full field simulations.\n In this paper we present an application of the multiscale sequential fully implicit (MS SFI) framework to simulate extremely complex high-resolution models with simplified physics. This enables us to perform fast evaluations of geological uncertainty, such as in the geoscreening workflow. The multiscale SFI method computes each timestep in two steps: First, it solves a nonlinear equation for pressure (and flow). Then, it solves a nonlinear equation for saturations and mole fractions. The pressure equation is solved iteratively using a multiscale approach.\n The MS SFI method has recently been made generally available in a commercial reservoir simulator and can easily be benchmarked with a state-of-the-art fully implicit (FI) method. The MS SFI method was used to successfully simulate a realistic high-resolution geological model in a practical time frame, achieving approximately 10 times speedup in CPU time compared to the FI method. This demonstrates the ability of the MS SFI method to effectively deal with extremely complex models, enabling fast quantification of geological uncertainty with a shorter turnaround time. In many instances the MS SFI method enables simulation of large models at the original geological resolutions without the need for upscaling.\n Finally, we demonstrate how the MS SFI method benefits a geology screening workflow and discuss future use of the MS SFI framework to create fit-for-purpose simulation engines for other workflows.","PeriodicalId":205933,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiscale Reservoir Simulation of High-Resolution Models\",\"authors\":\"J. Natvig, Daniel Dias, F. Bratvedt, Shingo Watanabe, Zhuoyi Li, Antonina Kozlova, P. Tomin, Jiamin Jiang, Xundan Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212231-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To quantify the uncertainty in reservoir performance, it is common to build ensembles of models that sample the space of possible reservoirs that are consistent with the available data. To evaluate the spread of possible outcomes, simulations experiments are run for each model in the ensemble to calculate for instance recovery factor. The geoscreening workflow is a common way to do this systematically and in a reasonable time. It can work as follows: First, run simulations with simplified physics to calculate recovery factor for every model in the ensemble. Then, use recovery factor (and other quantities) to rank and select representative models for high, medium, and low performance scenarios that can be used for full field simulations.\\n In this paper we present an application of the multiscale sequential fully implicit (MS SFI) framework to simulate extremely complex high-resolution models with simplified physics. This enables us to perform fast evaluations of geological uncertainty, such as in the geoscreening workflow. The multiscale SFI method computes each timestep in two steps: First, it solves a nonlinear equation for pressure (and flow). Then, it solves a nonlinear equation for saturations and mole fractions. The pressure equation is solved iteratively using a multiscale approach.\\n The MS SFI method has recently been made generally available in a commercial reservoir simulator and can easily be benchmarked with a state-of-the-art fully implicit (FI) method. The MS SFI method was used to successfully simulate a realistic high-resolution geological model in a practical time frame, achieving approximately 10 times speedup in CPU time compared to the FI method. This demonstrates the ability of the MS SFI method to effectively deal with extremely complex models, enabling fast quantification of geological uncertainty with a shorter turnaround time. In many instances the MS SFI method enables simulation of large models at the original geological resolutions without the need for upscaling.\\n Finally, we demonstrate how the MS SFI method benefits a geology screening workflow and discuss future use of the MS SFI framework to create fit-for-purpose simulation engines for other workflows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212231-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212231-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了量化储层动态的不确定性,通常建立模型集合,对可能的储层空间进行采样,使其与现有数据一致。为了评估可能结果的分布,对集合中的每个模型进行了模拟实验,以计算例如恢复因子。地质筛选工作流程是在合理的时间内系统地完成这一工作的常用方法。它可以这样做:首先,用简化的物理模拟来计算集合中每个模型的采收率。然后,使用恢复系数(和其他数量)对可用于全现场模拟的高、中、低性能场景的代表性模型进行排序和选择。在本文中,我们提出了多尺度序列全隐式(MS SFI)框架的应用,以模拟极其复杂的高分辨率模型与简化的物理。这使我们能够执行地质不确定性的快速评估,例如在地质筛选工作流程中。多尺度SFI方法分两步计算每个时间步:首先,求解压力(和流量)的非线性方程;然后,求解了饱和和摩尔分数的非线性方程。采用多尺度方法迭代求解压力方程。MS SFI方法最近在商业油藏模拟器中普遍可用,并且可以很容易地与最先进的全隐式(FI)方法进行基准测试。MS SFI方法在实际时间框架内成功模拟了真实的高分辨率地质模型,与FI方法相比,CPU时间加快了约10倍。这证明了MS SFI方法能够有效地处理极其复杂的模型,能够在更短的周转时间内快速量化地质不确定性。在许多情况下,MS SFI方法可以在原始地质分辨率下模拟大型模型,而无需升级。最后,我们演示了MS SFI方法如何使地质筛选工作流程受益,并讨论了MS SFI框架的未来使用,以创建适合其他工作流程的目的模拟引擎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiscale Reservoir Simulation of High-Resolution Models
To quantify the uncertainty in reservoir performance, it is common to build ensembles of models that sample the space of possible reservoirs that are consistent with the available data. To evaluate the spread of possible outcomes, simulations experiments are run for each model in the ensemble to calculate for instance recovery factor. The geoscreening workflow is a common way to do this systematically and in a reasonable time. It can work as follows: First, run simulations with simplified physics to calculate recovery factor for every model in the ensemble. Then, use recovery factor (and other quantities) to rank and select representative models for high, medium, and low performance scenarios that can be used for full field simulations. In this paper we present an application of the multiscale sequential fully implicit (MS SFI) framework to simulate extremely complex high-resolution models with simplified physics. This enables us to perform fast evaluations of geological uncertainty, such as in the geoscreening workflow. The multiscale SFI method computes each timestep in two steps: First, it solves a nonlinear equation for pressure (and flow). Then, it solves a nonlinear equation for saturations and mole fractions. The pressure equation is solved iteratively using a multiscale approach. The MS SFI method has recently been made generally available in a commercial reservoir simulator and can easily be benchmarked with a state-of-the-art fully implicit (FI) method. The MS SFI method was used to successfully simulate a realistic high-resolution geological model in a practical time frame, achieving approximately 10 times speedup in CPU time compared to the FI method. This demonstrates the ability of the MS SFI method to effectively deal with extremely complex models, enabling fast quantification of geological uncertainty with a shorter turnaround time. In many instances the MS SFI method enables simulation of large models at the original geological resolutions without the need for upscaling. Finally, we demonstrate how the MS SFI method benefits a geology screening workflow and discuss future use of the MS SFI framework to create fit-for-purpose simulation engines for other workflows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信