{"title":"空间显示的分析与实证评价","authors":"Mountaz Hascoët","doi":"10.1145/286498.286739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a methodology for evaluating spatial display techniques. Our approach is based on two different types of evaluation : analytical experiments and user studies. This approach is important because it uncovers aspects not detected when either technique is used alone. We apply this approach to the comparison of two different layout techniques.","PeriodicalId":153619,"journal":{"name":"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical versus empirical evaluation of spatial displays\",\"authors\":\"Mountaz Hascoët\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/286498.286739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a methodology for evaluating spatial display techniques. Our approach is based on two different types of evaluation : analytical experiments and user studies. This approach is important because it uncovers aspects not detected when either technique is used alone. We apply this approach to the comparison of two different layout techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytical versus empirical evaluation of spatial displays
In this paper, we propose a methodology for evaluating spatial display techniques. Our approach is based on two different types of evaluation : analytical experiments and user studies. This approach is important because it uncovers aspects not detected when either technique is used alone. We apply this approach to the comparison of two different layout techniques.