单次飞秒激光诱导HfO2/ sio2基光学薄膜的损伤和烧蚀:少周期脉冲和110 fs脉冲的比较

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2019-11-20 DOI:10.1117/12.2536423
N. Talisa, M. Tripepi, Brandon Harris, A. Alshafey, J. Krebs, A. Davenport, E. Randel, C. Menoni, E. Chowdhury
{"title":"单次飞秒激光诱导HfO2/ sio2基光学薄膜的损伤和烧蚀:少周期脉冲和110 fs脉冲的比较","authors":"N. Talisa, M. Tripepi, Brandon Harris, A. Alshafey, J. Krebs, A. Davenport, E. Randel, C. Menoni, E. Chowdhury","doi":"10.1117/12.2536423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pulse duration dependence of single-shot laser-induced damage and ablation of HfO2/SiO2-based double- and quadlayer thin films is studied using time-resolved surface microscopy (TRSM) and ex situ imaging down to the few-cycle pulse (FCP) regime. Both samples exhibit a raised, \"blister\" morphology for a range of fluences between the damage and ablation thresholds. The fluence range associated with blister formation is much larger for FCPs than for 110 fs pulses, and TRSM images at early time-delays show that the density of the laser-generated plasma is much higher for 110 fs pulses for a lower fluence relative to the damage threshold. Also, for high enough fluences the excited electron density exhibits a fast decay down to a significantly high value, which remains even after the onset of mechanical damage of the layers. The pulse duration dependence suggests that as fluence is increased, the increase in absorbed energy is more gradual for FCPs, which points towards inherent differences in the way high intensity FCPs are absorbed in dielectrics relative to longer femtosecond laser pulses.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-shot femtosecond laser-induced damage and ablation of HfO2/SiO2-based optical thin films: a comparison between few-cycle pulses and 110 fs pulses\",\"authors\":\"N. Talisa, M. Tripepi, Brandon Harris, A. Alshafey, J. Krebs, A. Davenport, E. Randel, C. Menoni, E. Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2536423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pulse duration dependence of single-shot laser-induced damage and ablation of HfO2/SiO2-based double- and quadlayer thin films is studied using time-resolved surface microscopy (TRSM) and ex situ imaging down to the few-cycle pulse (FCP) regime. Both samples exhibit a raised, \\\"blister\\\" morphology for a range of fluences between the damage and ablation thresholds. The fluence range associated with blister formation is much larger for FCPs than for 110 fs pulses, and TRSM images at early time-delays show that the density of the laser-generated plasma is much higher for 110 fs pulses for a lower fluence relative to the damage threshold. Also, for high enough fluences the excited electron density exhibits a fast decay down to a significantly high value, which remains even after the onset of mechanical damage of the layers. The pulse duration dependence suggests that as fluence is increased, the increase in absorbed energy is more gradual for FCPs, which points towards inherent differences in the way high intensity FCPs are absorbed in dielectrics relative to longer femtosecond laser pulses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser Damage\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser Damage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2536423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2536423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

利用时间分辨表面显微镜(TRSM)和非原位成像(FCP)研究了单次激光诱导HfO2/ sio2基双层和四层薄膜损伤和烧蚀的脉冲持续时间依赖性。在损伤和消融阈值之间的一系列影响下,两个样品都表现出凸起的“水泡”形态。与110 fs脉冲相比,fcp与水疱形成相关的影响范围要大得多,并且早期延时的TRSM图像显示,110 fs脉冲的激光产生的等离子体密度要高得多,而相对于损伤阈值的影响较小。此外,对于足够高的影响,激发的电子密度表现出快速衰减到一个显著的高值,即使在层的机械损伤开始后仍然存在。脉冲持续时间的依赖性表明,随着通量的增加,fcp吸收能量的增加更为缓慢,这表明相对于更长的飞秒激光脉冲,高强度fcp在介电介质中吸收的方式存在固有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-shot femtosecond laser-induced damage and ablation of HfO2/SiO2-based optical thin films: a comparison between few-cycle pulses and 110 fs pulses
The pulse duration dependence of single-shot laser-induced damage and ablation of HfO2/SiO2-based double- and quadlayer thin films is studied using time-resolved surface microscopy (TRSM) and ex situ imaging down to the few-cycle pulse (FCP) regime. Both samples exhibit a raised, "blister" morphology for a range of fluences between the damage and ablation thresholds. The fluence range associated with blister formation is much larger for FCPs than for 110 fs pulses, and TRSM images at early time-delays show that the density of the laser-generated plasma is much higher for 110 fs pulses for a lower fluence relative to the damage threshold. Also, for high enough fluences the excited electron density exhibits a fast decay down to a significantly high value, which remains even after the onset of mechanical damage of the layers. The pulse duration dependence suggests that as fluence is increased, the increase in absorbed energy is more gradual for FCPs, which points towards inherent differences in the way high intensity FCPs are absorbed in dielectrics relative to longer femtosecond laser pulses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信