静态电压稳定裕度评估决策树属性选择方法比较

Weijie Li, Pei Zhang, S. Su, Xiangfei Meng, Changxin Ding, Yuwei Wang
{"title":"静态电压稳定裕度评估决策树属性选择方法比较","authors":"Weijie Li, Pei Zhang, S. Su, Xiangfei Meng, Changxin Ding, Yuwei Wang","doi":"10.1109/CIEEC.2018.8745858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision tree (DT) as an effective data mining method has been widely used in voltage stability assessment. The selection of decision tree’s input attributes is critical because input attributes affect the accuracy and efficiency of the decision tree. This paper compares two attribute selection methods: participation factor method and Relief-F algorithm. Participation factor method is based on modal analysis of Jacobi matrix, while Relief-F algorithm is a mathematical approach that does not require power system knowledge. Two DTs with the same number of input attributes identified by participation factor analysis and Relief-F algorithm respectively are constructed for comparison in term of accuracy and efficiency. A case study on a practical power system indicates that two methods identify similar attributes and the accuracy of two DTs are close.","PeriodicalId":329285,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC)","volume":"51 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Weijie Li, Pei Zhang, S. Su, Xiangfei Meng, Changxin Ding, Yuwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIEEC.2018.8745858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision tree (DT) as an effective data mining method has been widely used in voltage stability assessment. The selection of decision tree’s input attributes is critical because input attributes affect the accuracy and efficiency of the decision tree. This paper compares two attribute selection methods: participation factor method and Relief-F algorithm. Participation factor method is based on modal analysis of Jacobi matrix, while Relief-F algorithm is a mathematical approach that does not require power system knowledge. Two DTs with the same number of input attributes identified by participation factor analysis and Relief-F algorithm respectively are constructed for comparison in term of accuracy and efficiency. A case study on a practical power system indicates that two methods identify similar attributes and the accuracy of two DTs are close.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC)\",\"volume\":\"51 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEEC.2018.8745858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEEC.2018.8745858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

决策树作为一种有效的数据挖掘方法,在电压稳定评估中得到了广泛的应用。决策树输入属性的选择至关重要,因为输入属性影响决策树的准确性和效率。本文比较了两种属性选择方法:参与因子法和Relief-F算法。参与因子法是基于雅可比矩阵的模态分析,而Relief-F算法是一种不需要电力系统知识的数学方法。分别构建由参与因子分析和Relief-F算法识别的输入属性数相同的两个dt,对准确率和效率进行比较。通过对实际电力系统的实例分析表明,两种方法识别出相似的属性,两种dt的准确率接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Decision Tree Attribute Selection Methods for Static Voltage Stability Margin Assessment
Decision tree (DT) as an effective data mining method has been widely used in voltage stability assessment. The selection of decision tree’s input attributes is critical because input attributes affect the accuracy and efficiency of the decision tree. This paper compares two attribute selection methods: participation factor method and Relief-F algorithm. Participation factor method is based on modal analysis of Jacobi matrix, while Relief-F algorithm is a mathematical approach that does not require power system knowledge. Two DTs with the same number of input attributes identified by participation factor analysis and Relief-F algorithm respectively are constructed for comparison in term of accuracy and efficiency. A case study on a practical power system indicates that two methods identify similar attributes and the accuracy of two DTs are close.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信