对谁有影响?对比研究影响与公众参与

The Impact Agenda Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.11

Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer

{"title":"对谁有影响?对比研究影响与公众参与","authors":"Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers how the concept of ‘research impact’ has been developed and articulated with respect to two, potentially very different audiences: policymakers and the broader public. This chapter includes an analysis of recent REF (Research Excellence Framework) and research funder guidance, statements and opportunities relating to these two groups. This chapter also draws on interview data with a range of research funders","PeriodicalId":378348,"journal":{"name":"The Impact Agenda","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact on whom? Contrasting research impact with public engagement\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter considers how the concept of ‘research impact’ has been developed and articulated with respect to two, potentially very different audiences: policymakers and the broader public. This chapter includes an analysis of recent REF (Research Excellence Framework) and research funder guidance, statements and opportunities relating to these two groups. This chapter also draws on interview data with a range of research funders\",\"PeriodicalId\":378348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Impact Agenda\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Impact Agenda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Impact Agenda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考虑了“研究影响”的概念是如何在两个可能非常不同的受众:决策者和更广泛的公众中发展和阐述的。本章包括对最近的REF(卓越研究框架)和与这两个群体相关的研究基金指导、声明和机会的分析。本章还引用了与一系列研究资助者的访谈数据

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Impact on whom? Contrasting research impact with public engagement

This chapter considers how the concept of ‘research impact’ has been developed and articulated with respect to two, potentially very different audiences: policymakers and the broader public. This chapter includes an analysis of recent REF (Research Excellence Framework) and research funder guidance, statements and opportunities relating to these two groups. This chapter also draws on interview data with a range of research funders

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Impact Agenda

自引率

0.00%

发文量