服务主导逻辑与服务科学的价值主张:中关村电器市场新洞察

Zhen-hua Wan, Ming-li Zhang
{"title":"服务主导逻辑与服务科学的价值主张:中关村电器市场新洞察","authors":"Zhen-hua Wan, Ming-li Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SOLI.2014.6960715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One key fundamental premise in service-dominant logic is that the enterprise cannot deliver value, but only offer value proposition. That is, business enterprises, or more generally, any actor, cannot deliver value to other actors; they can only offer a value proposition for (usually mutually) benefit. Thus compelling value propositions can establish connections and relationships among service systems, and can be developed for gaining competitive advantages. However, applied research to date suggests that relatively little is known about the related discussions carried out for and against the context of IT and electronics market such as Chinese Zhongguancun market viewed through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science. In this article, drawing on the extent service literature on the concept of value proposition and through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science, we explore and identify the focal service network initiator and the two main participating actors and the three primary pillars of the reciprocal value proposition, we further propose a conceptual value proposition model for deeply understanding of reciprocal value proposition within and among the multiple service network actors engaging with one another through the interrelated three enablers by service dialogical communications. And then, we examine its appropriateness through the two-selected case analysis in the context of Chinese electronics market such as Zhongguancun market, highlight how the three main stakeholders by joint efforts, cocreate reciprocal value propositions for their benefits, collectively and/or respectively, in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science. Finally, we conclude with gaining the new insights into value propositions, and suggest managerial implications and identify areas for future research.","PeriodicalId":191638,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value propositions in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science: New insights into the Zhongguancun electrics market\",\"authors\":\"Zhen-hua Wan, Ming-li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOLI.2014.6960715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One key fundamental premise in service-dominant logic is that the enterprise cannot deliver value, but only offer value proposition. That is, business enterprises, or more generally, any actor, cannot deliver value to other actors; they can only offer a value proposition for (usually mutually) benefit. Thus compelling value propositions can establish connections and relationships among service systems, and can be developed for gaining competitive advantages. However, applied research to date suggests that relatively little is known about the related discussions carried out for and against the context of IT and electronics market such as Chinese Zhongguancun market viewed through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science. In this article, drawing on the extent service literature on the concept of value proposition and through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science, we explore and identify the focal service network initiator and the two main participating actors and the three primary pillars of the reciprocal value proposition, we further propose a conceptual value proposition model for deeply understanding of reciprocal value proposition within and among the multiple service network actors engaging with one another through the interrelated three enablers by service dialogical communications. And then, we examine its appropriateness through the two-selected case analysis in the context of Chinese electronics market such as Zhongguancun market, highlight how the three main stakeholders by joint efforts, cocreate reciprocal value propositions for their benefits, collectively and/or respectively, in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science. Finally, we conclude with gaining the new insights into value propositions, and suggest managerial implications and identify areas for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2014.6960715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2014.6960715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在以服务为主导的逻辑中,一个关键的基本前提是企业不能提供价值,而只能提供价值主张。也就是说,商业企业,或者更一般地说,任何参与者,都不能向其他参与者交付价值;他们只能为(通常是相互)利益提供价值主张。因此,引人注目的价值主张可以在服务系统之间建立联系和关系,并可以为获得竞争优势而开发。然而,迄今为止的应用研究表明,通过服务主导逻辑和服务科学的视角,对中国中关村等IT和电子市场背景下的相关讨论知之甚少。本文借鉴有关价值主张概念的服务文献,通过服务主导逻辑和服务科学的视角,探索并确定了服务网络的核心发起者、两个主要参与者和互惠价值主张的三个主要支柱。我们进一步提出了一个概念性价值主张模型,以深入理解多个服务网络参与者内部和之间的互惠价值主张,这些参与者通过服务对话通信通过相互关联的三个促成因素相互参与。在此基础上,本文以中关村市场为例,通过两种选择的案例分析来考察其适用性,重点分析了三个主要利益相关者如何根据服务主导逻辑和服务科学,通过共同努力,共同或分别为其利益创造互惠的价值主张。最后,我们总结了对价值主张的新见解,并提出了管理意义,并确定了未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value propositions in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science: New insights into the Zhongguancun electrics market
One key fundamental premise in service-dominant logic is that the enterprise cannot deliver value, but only offer value proposition. That is, business enterprises, or more generally, any actor, cannot deliver value to other actors; they can only offer a value proposition for (usually mutually) benefit. Thus compelling value propositions can establish connections and relationships among service systems, and can be developed for gaining competitive advantages. However, applied research to date suggests that relatively little is known about the related discussions carried out for and against the context of IT and electronics market such as Chinese Zhongguancun market viewed through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science. In this article, drawing on the extent service literature on the concept of value proposition and through the lens of service-dominant logic and service science, we explore and identify the focal service network initiator and the two main participating actors and the three primary pillars of the reciprocal value proposition, we further propose a conceptual value proposition model for deeply understanding of reciprocal value proposition within and among the multiple service network actors engaging with one another through the interrelated three enablers by service dialogical communications. And then, we examine its appropriateness through the two-selected case analysis in the context of Chinese electronics market such as Zhongguancun market, highlight how the three main stakeholders by joint efforts, cocreate reciprocal value propositions for their benefits, collectively and/or respectively, in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science. Finally, we conclude with gaining the new insights into value propositions, and suggest managerial implications and identify areas for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信