评价知觉与学生学习成绩的关系

M. Muchlis, S. Ibnu, S. Subandi, S. Marfuah
{"title":"评价知觉与学生学习成绩的关系","authors":"M. Muchlis, S. Ibnu, S. Subandi, S. Marfuah","doi":"10.2991/snk-19.2019.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aim to describe relationships between perception toward assessment with learning result of student. Perception toward assessment it means student percepts assessment as assessment of learning (AoL), assessment for learning (AfL) or assessment as learning (AaL). Subject research is 35 students of Chemistry Education of Surabaya State University. Research design is one shot case study repeated because one student group given three times different treatment without control group. Relationships between both is analyzed by chi-square test and percentage of student amount that obtaining the highest and lower in learning result appropriate its perception toward assessment. Result of analysis indicate that between perception toward assessment with learning result of student are not significant in relationships. However, if student’s the highest and lower categories in learning result are added at implementation of AoL, AfL and AaL are always predominated by student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in learning result at implementation of AoL is 15 (42,9%), 14(40%) and 2 (5,7%) student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AfL is 23 (65,7%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 0(0%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AaL is 20 ( 57,1%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 3 ( 8,6%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Keywords-perception toward assessment, learning result of student, assessment of learning, assessment for learning, assessment as learning.","PeriodicalId":256735,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Between Perception toward Assessment with Learning Result of Student\",\"authors\":\"M. Muchlis, S. Ibnu, S. Subandi, S. Marfuah\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/snk-19.2019.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aim to describe relationships between perception toward assessment with learning result of student. Perception toward assessment it means student percepts assessment as assessment of learning (AoL), assessment for learning (AfL) or assessment as learning (AaL). Subject research is 35 students of Chemistry Education of Surabaya State University. Research design is one shot case study repeated because one student group given three times different treatment without control group. Relationships between both is analyzed by chi-square test and percentage of student amount that obtaining the highest and lower in learning result appropriate its perception toward assessment. Result of analysis indicate that between perception toward assessment with learning result of student are not significant in relationships. However, if student’s the highest and lower categories in learning result are added at implementation of AoL, AfL and AaL are always predominated by student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in learning result at implementation of AoL is 15 (42,9%), 14(40%) and 2 (5,7%) student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AfL is 23 (65,7%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 0(0%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AaL is 20 ( 57,1%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 3 ( 8,6%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Keywords-perception toward assessment, learning result of student, assessment of learning, assessment for learning, assessment as learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨评核知觉与学生学习效果的关系。对评估的感知是指学生将评估感知为学习评估(AoL)、学习评估(AfL)或学习评估(AaL)。课题研究对象为泗水州立大学化学教育系35名学生。研究设计是一次案例研究,因为一个学生组在没有对照组的情况下给予三次不同的治疗。通过卡方检验分析两者之间的关系,并分析学习成绩最高和较低的学生占其对评价的感知的百分比。分析结果表明,学生对评价的感知与学习成绩之间的关系不显著。然而,如果在实施AoL时增加学生对学习结果的最高和最低类别,则AfL和AaL总是以学生依次感知为AoL、AfL和AaL为主。在实施在线评价时,获得最高和最低学习成绩的学生分别为15名(42.9%)、14名(40%)和2名(5.7%),分别将评价依次感知为AoL、AfL和AaL。在实施AfL时,结果学习得分最高和较低的学生分别为23名(65.7%)、6名(17.1%)和0名(0%),依次被感知为AoL、AfL和AaL。在实施AaL时,结果学习得分最高和较低的学生分别为20名(57.1%)、6名(17.1%)和3名(8.6%),依次被感知为AoL、AfL和AaL。关键词:对评价的感知,学生的学习结果,学习评价,为学习评价,作为学习的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships Between Perception toward Assessment with Learning Result of Student
This research aim to describe relationships between perception toward assessment with learning result of student. Perception toward assessment it means student percepts assessment as assessment of learning (AoL), assessment for learning (AfL) or assessment as learning (AaL). Subject research is 35 students of Chemistry Education of Surabaya State University. Research design is one shot case study repeated because one student group given three times different treatment without control group. Relationships between both is analyzed by chi-square test and percentage of student amount that obtaining the highest and lower in learning result appropriate its perception toward assessment. Result of analysis indicate that between perception toward assessment with learning result of student are not significant in relationships. However, if student’s the highest and lower categories in learning result are added at implementation of AoL, AfL and AaL are always predominated by student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in learning result at implementation of AoL is 15 (42,9%), 14(40%) and 2 (5,7%) student which percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AfL is 23 (65,7%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 0(0%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Amount of student which is obtaining the highest and lower in result learning at implementation of AaL is 20 ( 57,1%), 6 ( 17,1%) and 3 ( 8,6%) student which is percept assessment successively as AoL, AfL and AaL. Keywords-perception toward assessment, learning result of student, assessment of learning, assessment for learning, assessment as learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信