生态设计还是生态创新?建筑业的案例。

S. Ben Slimane, Anna Glaser, C. Auplat
{"title":"生态设计还是生态创新?建筑业的案例。","authors":"S. Ben Slimane, Anna Glaser, C. Auplat","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2649866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to explore the concepts of eco-design and eco-innovation in the context of smart cities. In terms of impacts, the two approaches are considered to be sustainable solutions that imply finding the right balance between ecological and economic requirements by maximizing sustainability throughout all the stages of the product development process. However, despite the complimentarities of their impacts, the two concepts are not clear in terms of targets and mechanisms. The aim of this article is to discuss these differences within the building and construction sector in the context of smart cities. We argue that the development of smart cities is closely linked to the context of sustainable development and therefore the strategy related to the integration of environmental considerations into the design stage is determinant when engineering the buildings and selecting the materials. In order to investigate empirically the understanding of the two concepts among professionals, we use a media content analysis. Within the LexisNexis database, we selected European professional magazines from the environment, construction and building categories published in English, French and German languages over the period 2005-2015. Our results are threefold: first, there is a predominant use of the eco-design compared to the eco-innovation concept; second, there is a strong difference between English and French professional magazine articles, the latter discussing eco-design much more often than the first; and finally, the range of discussed eco-design mechanisms and impacts got slowly broader since 2012. We discuss the results and try to explain them according to the evolution of the regulation in this field.","PeriodicalId":447033,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Innovation (Topic)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eco-Design or Eco-Innovation? The Case of the Building Sector.\",\"authors\":\"S. Ben Slimane, Anna Glaser, C. Auplat\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2649866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to explore the concepts of eco-design and eco-innovation in the context of smart cities. In terms of impacts, the two approaches are considered to be sustainable solutions that imply finding the right balance between ecological and economic requirements by maximizing sustainability throughout all the stages of the product development process. However, despite the complimentarities of their impacts, the two concepts are not clear in terms of targets and mechanisms. The aim of this article is to discuss these differences within the building and construction sector in the context of smart cities. We argue that the development of smart cities is closely linked to the context of sustainable development and therefore the strategy related to the integration of environmental considerations into the design stage is determinant when engineering the buildings and selecting the materials. In order to investigate empirically the understanding of the two concepts among professionals, we use a media content analysis. Within the LexisNexis database, we selected European professional magazines from the environment, construction and building categories published in English, French and German languages over the period 2005-2015. Our results are threefold: first, there is a predominant use of the eco-design compared to the eco-innovation concept; second, there is a strong difference between English and French professional magazine articles, the latter discussing eco-design much more often than the first; and finally, the range of discussed eco-design mechanisms and impacts got slowly broader since 2012. We discuss the results and try to explain them according to the evolution of the regulation in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Innovation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Innovation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2649866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Innovation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2649866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在探讨智慧城市背景下的生态设计和生态创新概念。就影响而言,这两种方法被认为是可持续的解决方案,意味着通过在产品开发过程的所有阶段最大化可持续性,在生态和经济需求之间找到适当的平衡。然而,尽管它们的影响具有互补性,但这两个概念在目标和机制方面并不明确。本文的目的是讨论智慧城市背景下建筑和建筑行业的这些差异。我们认为,智慧城市的发展与可持续发展的背景密切相关,因此,在设计建筑和选择材料时,将环境因素纳入设计阶段的策略是决定性的。为了实证调查专业人士对这两个概念的理解,我们使用媒体内容分析。在LexisNexis数据库中,我们从2005-2015年期间以英语、法语和德语出版的环境、建筑和建筑类别中选择了欧洲专业杂志。我们的研究结果有三个方面:首先,与生态创新概念相比,生态设计的使用占主导地位;其次,英语和法语专业杂志文章之间存在很大差异,后者讨论生态设计的频率远高于前者;最后,自2012年以来,讨论生态设计机制和影响的范围逐渐扩大。我们讨论了这些结果,并试图根据该领域法规的演变来解释它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eco-Design or Eco-Innovation? The Case of the Building Sector.
The aim of this paper is to explore the concepts of eco-design and eco-innovation in the context of smart cities. In terms of impacts, the two approaches are considered to be sustainable solutions that imply finding the right balance between ecological and economic requirements by maximizing sustainability throughout all the stages of the product development process. However, despite the complimentarities of their impacts, the two concepts are not clear in terms of targets and mechanisms. The aim of this article is to discuss these differences within the building and construction sector in the context of smart cities. We argue that the development of smart cities is closely linked to the context of sustainable development and therefore the strategy related to the integration of environmental considerations into the design stage is determinant when engineering the buildings and selecting the materials. In order to investigate empirically the understanding of the two concepts among professionals, we use a media content analysis. Within the LexisNexis database, we selected European professional magazines from the environment, construction and building categories published in English, French and German languages over the period 2005-2015. Our results are threefold: first, there is a predominant use of the eco-design compared to the eco-innovation concept; second, there is a strong difference between English and French professional magazine articles, the latter discussing eco-design much more often than the first; and finally, the range of discussed eco-design mechanisms and impacts got slowly broader since 2012. We discuss the results and try to explain them according to the evolution of the regulation in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信