村基金计划评估

K. Kaharuddin, R. Rusli
{"title":"村基金计划评估","authors":"K. Kaharuddin, R. Rusli","doi":"10.30872/jfor.v23i4.10246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Village funds allocation is a government program in accelerating development. The program is expected to improve the welfare of residents in remote rural areas. In addition to being allocated for development, the program is also expected to be carried out by empowering and increasing rural human resources. Based on this, research on the evaluation of village funds is needed. This study is intended to evaluate all components in the implementation of the village fund program. This evaluation research uses the CIPP evaluation model. CIPP evaluation model stands for Context, Input, Process and Product. The selection of the CIPP evaluation model is based on the subjectivity of the researcher because the CIPP evaluation model is a comprehensive framework to direct the implementation of formative evaluation and summative evaluation of program objects, projects, personnel, products, institutions and systems. The research method used is descriptive qualitative and quantitative. The results of this study are expected to be input for stakeholders regarding the recommendations for the final results of the study. Based on the results of the evaluation research, a score of 77.78% was obtained for Context evaluation. 87, 51% for input evaluation. 71.42% for Process evaluation and 87.51% for Product evaluation. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that the program be continued with several improvements and refinements.","PeriodicalId":104975,"journal":{"name":"FORUM EKONOMI","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluasi program dana desa\",\"authors\":\"K. Kaharuddin, R. Rusli\",\"doi\":\"10.30872/jfor.v23i4.10246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Village funds allocation is a government program in accelerating development. The program is expected to improve the welfare of residents in remote rural areas. In addition to being allocated for development, the program is also expected to be carried out by empowering and increasing rural human resources. Based on this, research on the evaluation of village funds is needed. This study is intended to evaluate all components in the implementation of the village fund program. This evaluation research uses the CIPP evaluation model. CIPP evaluation model stands for Context, Input, Process and Product. The selection of the CIPP evaluation model is based on the subjectivity of the researcher because the CIPP evaluation model is a comprehensive framework to direct the implementation of formative evaluation and summative evaluation of program objects, projects, personnel, products, institutions and systems. The research method used is descriptive qualitative and quantitative. The results of this study are expected to be input for stakeholders regarding the recommendations for the final results of the study. Based on the results of the evaluation research, a score of 77.78% was obtained for Context evaluation. 87, 51% for input evaluation. 71.42% for Process evaluation and 87.51% for Product evaluation. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that the program be continued with several improvements and refinements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FORUM EKONOMI\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FORUM EKONOMI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v23i4.10246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM EKONOMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v23i4.10246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

农村资金分配是政府加快发展的一项措施。该计划有望改善偏远农村地区居民的福利。除了用于发展之外,该方案还将通过增强和增加农村人力资源来实施。基于此,有必要对农村资金评价进行研究。本研究旨在评估乡村基金计划实施的所有组成部分。本评价研究采用CIPP评价模型。CIPP评价模型代表上下文、输入、过程和产品。CIPP评价模型的选择是基于研究者的主体性,因为CIPP评价模型是一个综合框架,指导对计划对象、项目、人员、产品、机构和系统进行形成性评价和总结性评价。本研究采用描述性、定性和定量相结合的研究方法。预计这项研究的结果将作为利益相关者对研究最终结果的建议的投入。根据评价研究的结果,Context评价的得分为77.78%。87,51%用于输入评价。过程评价占71.42%,产品评价占87.51%。根据研究结果,建议继续进行该计划,并进行若干改进和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluasi program dana desa
Village funds allocation is a government program in accelerating development. The program is expected to improve the welfare of residents in remote rural areas. In addition to being allocated for development, the program is also expected to be carried out by empowering and increasing rural human resources. Based on this, research on the evaluation of village funds is needed. This study is intended to evaluate all components in the implementation of the village fund program. This evaluation research uses the CIPP evaluation model. CIPP evaluation model stands for Context, Input, Process and Product. The selection of the CIPP evaluation model is based on the subjectivity of the researcher because the CIPP evaluation model is a comprehensive framework to direct the implementation of formative evaluation and summative evaluation of program objects, projects, personnel, products, institutions and systems. The research method used is descriptive qualitative and quantitative. The results of this study are expected to be input for stakeholders regarding the recommendations for the final results of the study. Based on the results of the evaluation research, a score of 77.78% was obtained for Context evaluation. 87, 51% for input evaluation. 71.42% for Process evaluation and 87.51% for Product evaluation. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that the program be continued with several improvements and refinements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信