基于消费者偏好的企业产品安全责任博弈分析

Meng Jiong, Guo Chun-xia
{"title":"基于消费者偏好的企业产品安全责任博弈分析","authors":"Meng Jiong, Guo Chun-xia","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applying the basic idea of game thoery, the essay studies on the consumers' pulling game for product safety responsibility(PSR) of firms, the requirement and struggling game between consumers and firms about PSR, and the firms' PSR signaling game. The results show that It is the key to optimize the pareto for firms and consumers that <sup>b</sup> kind of firms fulfil PSR preferably and signal the useful information to the consumers. Because category <sup>b</sup> firms' expected profit is bigger than that of category <sup>ω</sup>, therefore, even though consumers think category <sup>b</sup> firms is better, it is more likely to become a pressuring target, suffering more corporate social responsibility pressure. When the expected profit coming from the target firms is bigger than the struggling cost needed, both category <sup>b</sup> and <sup>ω</sup> firms would choose to fight. Category<sup>b</sup> firms adopt the positive PSR signaling strategies, and they send out the signals which can not imitated by the category<sup>ω</sup> firms, this method can not only make the market disassociate in a balanced and satisfactory, and solve the problems of category<sup>ω</sup> firms expelling category <sup>b</sup> firms, but also can help the category <sup>b</sup> firms create the fine social images, and increase the future profits.","PeriodicalId":280476,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A game analysis of firms' product safety responsibility basing on the consumer's preference\",\"authors\":\"Meng Jiong, Guo Chun-xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Applying the basic idea of game thoery, the essay studies on the consumers' pulling game for product safety responsibility(PSR) of firms, the requirement and struggling game between consumers and firms about PSR, and the firms' PSR signaling game. The results show that It is the key to optimize the pareto for firms and consumers that <sup>b</sup> kind of firms fulfil PSR preferably and signal the useful information to the consumers. Because category <sup>b</sup> firms' expected profit is bigger than that of category <sup>ω</sup>, therefore, even though consumers think category <sup>b</sup> firms is better, it is more likely to become a pressuring target, suffering more corporate social responsibility pressure. When the expected profit coming from the target firms is bigger than the struggling cost needed, both category <sup>b</sup> and <sup>ω</sup> firms would choose to fight. Category<sup>b</sup> firms adopt the positive PSR signaling strategies, and they send out the signals which can not imitated by the category<sup>ω</sup> firms, this method can not only make the market disassociate in a balanced and satisfactory, and solve the problems of category<sup>ω</sup> firms expelling category <sup>b</sup> firms, but also can help the category <sup>b</sup> firms create the fine social images, and increase the future profits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用博弈论的基本思想,研究了消费者对企业产品安全责任的拉动博弈、消费者与企业对产品安全责任的要求与挣扎博弈以及企业的产品安全责任信号博弈。结果表明:b类企业较好地履行PSR并向消费者发出有用信息是企业和消费者优化帕累托的关键。由于b类企业的预期利润大于ω类企业,因此,即使消费者认为b类企业更好,它也更有可能成为压力目标,承受更大的企业社会责任压力。当来自目标公司的预期利润大于所需的挣扎成本时,b类和ω类公司都会选择战斗。b类企业采用积极的PSR信号策略,发出了类企业无法模仿的信号,这种方法不仅能使市场均衡、满意地脱离,解决了类企业驱逐b类企业的问题,而且能帮助b类企业塑造良好的社会形象,增加未来利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A game analysis of firms' product safety responsibility basing on the consumer's preference
Applying the basic idea of game thoery, the essay studies on the consumers' pulling game for product safety responsibility(PSR) of firms, the requirement and struggling game between consumers and firms about PSR, and the firms' PSR signaling game. The results show that It is the key to optimize the pareto for firms and consumers that b kind of firms fulfil PSR preferably and signal the useful information to the consumers. Because category b firms' expected profit is bigger than that of category ω, therefore, even though consumers think category b firms is better, it is more likely to become a pressuring target, suffering more corporate social responsibility pressure. When the expected profit coming from the target firms is bigger than the struggling cost needed, both category b and ω firms would choose to fight. Categoryb firms adopt the positive PSR signaling strategies, and they send out the signals which can not imitated by the categoryω firms, this method can not only make the market disassociate in a balanced and satisfactory, and solve the problems of categoryω firms expelling category b firms, but also can help the category b firms create the fine social images, and increase the future profits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信