欧盟增值税分组的当前问题

Sebastian Pfeiffer
{"title":"欧盟增值税分组的当前问题","authors":"Sebastian Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1080/20488432.2015.1050790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU VAT grouping as an optional provision for the Member States of the European Union gives rise to several questions regarding its interpretation. In the article, the author analyses the current question of the EU VAT grouping notion which either have been controversially discussed throughout academic literature or have been brought up after the recent CJEU case law. While VAT grouping may be a means to facilitate VAT neutrality, the current EU provisions lead to disparities particularly in cross-border situations. Without further harmonisation, the potential of VAT grouping cannot be fully utilised and may lead to the eventual abolishment of VAT grouping.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current questions of EU VAT grouping\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Pfeiffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20488432.2015.1050790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EU VAT grouping as an optional provision for the Member States of the European Union gives rise to several questions regarding its interpretation. In the article, the author analyses the current question of the EU VAT grouping notion which either have been controversially discussed throughout academic literature or have been brought up after the recent CJEU case law. While VAT grouping may be a means to facilitate VAT neutrality, the current EU provisions lead to disparities particularly in cross-border situations. Without further harmonisation, the potential of VAT grouping cannot be fully utilised and may lead to the eventual abolishment of VAT grouping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2015.1050790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2015.1050790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

欧盟增值税分组作为欧盟成员国的一项可选条款,在其解释方面产生了几个问题。在本文中,作者分析了欧盟增值税分组概念的现状问题,这一问题在学术文献中一直存在争议,或者在最近的欧洲法院判例法之后才被提出。虽然增值税分组可能是促进增值税中立的一种手段,但目前欧盟的规定导致了差距,特别是在跨境情况下。如果没有进一步的协调,增值税分组的潜力就不能得到充分利用,并可能导致最终废除增值税分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current questions of EU VAT grouping
EU VAT grouping as an optional provision for the Member States of the European Union gives rise to several questions regarding its interpretation. In the article, the author analyses the current question of the EU VAT grouping notion which either have been controversially discussed throughout academic literature or have been brought up after the recent CJEU case law. While VAT grouping may be a means to facilitate VAT neutrality, the current EU provisions lead to disparities particularly in cross-border situations. Without further harmonisation, the potential of VAT grouping cannot be fully utilised and may lead to the eventual abolishment of VAT grouping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信