看见神的救恩

M. Crawford
{"title":"看见神的救恩","authors":"M. Crawford","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198802600.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In eighth-century Armenia a new genre of literature emerged consisting of commentary on the artwork that usually accompanies the Eusebian paratext. This chapter examines what these sources reveal about the way these images functioned paratextually in relation to the fourfold gospel. It first surveys the artistic developments that occurred across the diverse cultural traditions that transmitted the Eusebian apparatus. It next introduces Step‘anos of Siwnik’ and Nerses Šnorhali, the authors of the two treatises under consideration, and gives an overview of their interpretative approach. The latter part of the chapter turns to explain the functioning of the method and purpose of these commentaries by comparison with the theorization of memory in the classical rhetorical tradition. It argues that the commentaries model the use of the artwork as a mnemotechnical program intended as a preparatory exercise instructing the reader in the proper theological context within which the fourfold gospel is situated.","PeriodicalId":104850,"journal":{"name":"The Eusebian Canon Tables","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing the Salvation of God\",\"authors\":\"M. Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198802600.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In eighth-century Armenia a new genre of literature emerged consisting of commentary on the artwork that usually accompanies the Eusebian paratext. This chapter examines what these sources reveal about the way these images functioned paratextually in relation to the fourfold gospel. It first surveys the artistic developments that occurred across the diverse cultural traditions that transmitted the Eusebian apparatus. It next introduces Step‘anos of Siwnik’ and Nerses Šnorhali, the authors of the two treatises under consideration, and gives an overview of their interpretative approach. The latter part of the chapter turns to explain the functioning of the method and purpose of these commentaries by comparison with the theorization of memory in the classical rhetorical tradition. It argues that the commentaries model the use of the artwork as a mnemotechnical program intended as a preparatory exercise instructing the reader in the proper theological context within which the fourfold gospel is situated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Eusebian Canon Tables\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Eusebian Canon Tables\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198802600.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Eusebian Canon Tables","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198802600.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在八世纪的亚美尼亚出现了一种新的文学流派,包括对艺术作品的评论,通常伴随着尤西比亚文本。本章考察这些资料来源所揭示的,这些形象与四重福音的关系是平行的。它首先调查了在传播优西比亚装置的不同文化传统中发生的艺术发展。接下来介绍了Siwnik '和Nerses Šnorhali的步骤' anos,这两篇论文的作者正在考虑,并概述了他们的解释方法。本章的后半部分通过与古典修辞学传统中的记忆理论化的比较来解释这些评注的方法和目的的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeing the Salvation of God
In eighth-century Armenia a new genre of literature emerged consisting of commentary on the artwork that usually accompanies the Eusebian paratext. This chapter examines what these sources reveal about the way these images functioned paratextually in relation to the fourfold gospel. It first surveys the artistic developments that occurred across the diverse cultural traditions that transmitted the Eusebian apparatus. It next introduces Step‘anos of Siwnik’ and Nerses Šnorhali, the authors of the two treatises under consideration, and gives an overview of their interpretative approach. The latter part of the chapter turns to explain the functioning of the method and purpose of these commentaries by comparison with the theorization of memory in the classical rhetorical tradition. It argues that the commentaries model the use of the artwork as a mnemotechnical program intended as a preparatory exercise instructing the reader in the proper theological context within which the fourfold gospel is situated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信