Beyond AUROC & co.用于评估分布外检测性能

Galadrielle Humblot-Renaux, Sergio Escalera, T. Moeslund
{"title":"Beyond AUROC & co.用于评估分布外检测性能","authors":"Galadrielle Humblot-Renaux, Sergio Escalera, T. Moeslund","doi":"10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there has been a growing research interest in developing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods, there has been comparably little discussion around how these methods should be evaluated. Given their relevance for safe(r) AI, it is important to examine whether the basis for comparing OOD detection methods is consistent with practical needs. In this work, we take a closer look at the go-to metrics for evaluating OOD detection, and question the approach of exclusively reducing OOD detection to a binary classification task with little consideration for the detection threshold. We illustrate the limitations of current metrics (AUROC & its friends) and propose a new metric - Area Under the Threshold Curve (AUTC), which explicitly penalizes poor separation between ID and OOD samples. Scripts and data are available at https://github.com/glhr/beyond-auroc","PeriodicalId":355438,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond AUROC & co. for evaluating out-of-distribution detection performance\",\"authors\":\"Galadrielle Humblot-Renaux, Sergio Escalera, T. Moeslund\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there has been a growing research interest in developing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods, there has been comparably little discussion around how these methods should be evaluated. Given their relevance for safe(r) AI, it is important to examine whether the basis for comparing OOD detection methods is consistent with practical needs. In this work, we take a closer look at the go-to metrics for evaluating OOD detection, and question the approach of exclusively reducing OOD detection to a binary classification task with little consideration for the detection threshold. We illustrate the limitations of current metrics (AUROC & its friends) and propose a new metric - Area Under the Threshold Curve (AUTC), which explicitly penalizes poor separation between ID and OOD samples. Scripts and data are available at https://github.com/glhr/beyond-auroc\",\"PeriodicalId\":355438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们对开发出分布外(OOD)检测方法的研究兴趣日益浓厚,但关于如何评估这些方法的讨论却相对较少。鉴于它们与安全(r)人工智能的相关性,检查比较OOD检测方法的基础是否与实际需求一致是很重要的。在这项工作中,我们仔细研究了评估OOD检测的常用指标,并质疑将OOD检测专门简化为二进制分类任务而很少考虑检测阈值的方法。我们说明了当前指标(AUROC及其朋友)的局限性,并提出了一个新的指标——阈值曲线下面积(AUTC),它明确地惩罚了ID和OOD样本之间分离不良的情况。脚本和数据可在https://github.com/glhr/beyond-auroc上获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond AUROC & co. for evaluating out-of-distribution detection performance
While there has been a growing research interest in developing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods, there has been comparably little discussion around how these methods should be evaluated. Given their relevance for safe(r) AI, it is important to examine whether the basis for comparing OOD detection methods is consistent with practical needs. In this work, we take a closer look at the go-to metrics for evaluating OOD detection, and question the approach of exclusively reducing OOD detection to a binary classification task with little consideration for the detection threshold. We illustrate the limitations of current metrics (AUROC & its friends) and propose a new metric - Area Under the Threshold Curve (AUTC), which explicitly penalizes poor separation between ID and OOD samples. Scripts and data are available at https://github.com/glhr/beyond-auroc
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信