多治疗比较meta分析方法:文献综述

Mateo Zuluaga Gómez, Daniel Vanegas Isaza, J. H. D. Gómez
{"title":"多治疗比较meta分析方法:文献综述","authors":"Mateo Zuluaga Gómez, Daniel Vanegas Isaza, J. H. D. Gómez","doi":"10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses are systematic reviews that allow to make direct or indirect comparisons of different interventions from the data collection results of randomized clinical trials, grouping them in a common outcome or conglomerate which is expressed quantitatively. Other names given are network meta-analyses, or mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses or indirect meta-analyses. The use of the comparison of several treatments allows a greater estimation of the intervention effect. This is a guide for the physician to make more accurate decisions and to apply better care criteria to their patients. This literature review should help the reader to perform an organized and adequate critical reading (according to the JAMA recommendations) of the multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses. The article is addressed to authors and editors, and it contains information on how this type of studies should be interpreted and communicated.","PeriodicalId":109682,"journal":{"name":"Medicina UPB","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aproximación a los metanálisis de comparación de múltiples tratamientos: una revisión de la literatura\",\"authors\":\"Mateo Zuluaga Gómez, Daniel Vanegas Isaza, J. H. D. Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses are systematic reviews that allow to make direct or indirect comparisons of different interventions from the data collection results of randomized clinical trials, grouping them in a common outcome or conglomerate which is expressed quantitatively. Other names given are network meta-analyses, or mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses or indirect meta-analyses. The use of the comparison of several treatments allows a greater estimation of the intervention effect. This is a guide for the physician to make more accurate decisions and to apply better care criteria to their patients. This literature review should help the reader to perform an organized and adequate critical reading (according to the JAMA recommendations) of the multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses. The article is addressed to authors and editors, and it contains information on how this type of studies should be interpreted and communicated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina UPB\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina UPB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina UPB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多治疗比较荟萃分析是一种系统评价,它允许从随机临床试验的数据收集结果中直接或间接地比较不同的干预措施,将它们分组为一个共同的结果或量化的综合结果。其他名称还有网络荟萃分析,或混合治疗比较荟萃分析或间接荟萃分析。使用几种治疗方法的比较可以更好地估计干预效果。这是一个指导医生做出更准确的决定和应用更好的护理标准对他们的病人。这篇文献综述应该帮助读者对多治疗比较荟萃分析进行有组织和充分的批判性阅读(根据JAMA的建议)。这篇文章是写给作者和编辑的,它包含了如何解释和交流这类研究的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aproximación a los metanálisis de comparación de múltiples tratamientos: una revisión de la literatura
Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses are systematic reviews that allow to make direct or indirect comparisons of different interventions from the data collection results of randomized clinical trials, grouping them in a common outcome or conglomerate which is expressed quantitatively. Other names given are network meta-analyses, or mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses or indirect meta-analyses. The use of the comparison of several treatments allows a greater estimation of the intervention effect. This is a guide for the physician to make more accurate decisions and to apply better care criteria to their patients. This literature review should help the reader to perform an organized and adequate critical reading (according to the JAMA recommendations) of the multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses. The article is addressed to authors and editors, and it contains information on how this type of studies should be interpreted and communicated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信