O. Bahrs, K. Henze, F. Lowenstein, H. Abholz, Katharina Ilse, S. Wilm, Gertrud Bureick, S. Heim
{"title":"回顾对话作为发展与人相关的全面诊断的机会","authors":"O. Bahrs, K. Henze, F. Lowenstein, H. Abholz, Katharina Ilse, S. Wilm, Gertrud Bureick, S. Heim","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the long-term care of patients with chronic conditions, the process aspect of treatment is rarely in the focus of general practitioner(GP)-patient interactions. A specific interaction tool, the Review Dialogue (RD), has been developed to integrate patients’ health-related problems/risks as well as coping strategies/resources and to agree upon shared treatment objectives. Research question: Do periodical RDs contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives and do they arrive at an overall diagnosis (Balint)? Methods: GPs were randomized either into an intervention group (extra training and regular RD with 20 patients with chronic conditions) or into a control group (usual care). Videos of a sub-sample of patients (5 per practice) were taken at four points in time. This paper focuses on a sub-sample of 125 video-recorded GP-patient interactions, analysed using a semi-standardised procedure (RLI). An in-depth analysis of a maximum variation sample of eight GPs’ videotapes across four points in time was made to identify professional interaction strategies. Results: Implementing the RD and creating an overall holistic diagnosis is case-specific with respect to both, the GPs and the patients. Fostering individualised care RDs might contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives. Conclusions: Review Dialogues facilitate the GP-patient communication process about diagnostics and therapy helping to make the implied overall diagnosis explicit. Further research is needed.","PeriodicalId":402902,"journal":{"name":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review Dialogues as an Opportunity to Develop a Person-related Overall Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"O. Bahrs, K. Henze, F. Lowenstein, H. Abholz, Katharina Ilse, S. Wilm, Gertrud Bureick, S. Heim\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In the long-term care of patients with chronic conditions, the process aspect of treatment is rarely in the focus of general practitioner(GP)-patient interactions. A specific interaction tool, the Review Dialogue (RD), has been developed to integrate patients’ health-related problems/risks as well as coping strategies/resources and to agree upon shared treatment objectives. Research question: Do periodical RDs contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives and do they arrive at an overall diagnosis (Balint)? Methods: GPs were randomized either into an intervention group (extra training and regular RD with 20 patients with chronic conditions) or into a control group (usual care). Videos of a sub-sample of patients (5 per practice) were taken at four points in time. This paper focuses on a sub-sample of 125 video-recorded GP-patient interactions, analysed using a semi-standardised procedure (RLI). An in-depth analysis of a maximum variation sample of eight GPs’ videotapes across four points in time was made to identify professional interaction strategies. Results: Implementing the RD and creating an overall holistic diagnosis is case-specific with respect to both, the GPs and the patients. Fostering individualised care RDs might contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives. Conclusions: Review Dialogues facilitate the GP-patient communication process about diagnostics and therapy helping to make the implied overall diagnosis explicit. Further research is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review Dialogues as an Opportunity to Develop a Person-related Overall Diagnosis
Background: In the long-term care of patients with chronic conditions, the process aspect of treatment is rarely in the focus of general practitioner(GP)-patient interactions. A specific interaction tool, the Review Dialogue (RD), has been developed to integrate patients’ health-related problems/risks as well as coping strategies/resources and to agree upon shared treatment objectives. Research question: Do periodical RDs contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives and do they arrive at an overall diagnosis (Balint)? Methods: GPs were randomized either into an intervention group (extra training and regular RD with 20 patients with chronic conditions) or into a control group (usual care). Videos of a sub-sample of patients (5 per practice) were taken at four points in time. This paper focuses on a sub-sample of 125 video-recorded GP-patient interactions, analysed using a semi-standardised procedure (RLI). An in-depth analysis of a maximum variation sample of eight GPs’ videotapes across four points in time was made to identify professional interaction strategies. Results: Implementing the RD and creating an overall holistic diagnosis is case-specific with respect to both, the GPs and the patients. Fostering individualised care RDs might contribute to a better achievement of treatment objectives. Conclusions: Review Dialogues facilitate the GP-patient communication process about diagnostics and therapy helping to make the implied overall diagnosis explicit. Further research is needed.