共享的心智模型和任务分解

JoAnne Yong-Kwan Lim
{"title":"共享的心智模型和任务分解","authors":"JoAnne Yong-Kwan Lim","doi":"10.1108/tpm-07-2021-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe research on shared mental models (SMMs) focuses on the importance of all team members holding similar mental models to realize team performance. However, for a perceived decomposable task, it is not required for all team members to have similar mental models to achieve team performance. Moreover, unnecessary overlapping mental models among team members may engender information overloading, translating into suboptimal team performance. Absent from the current literature is an understanding of the factors that determine the minimal overlapping mental models required across specific members for team performance. The purpose of this study is to yield an understanding of these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study highlights that the requirement to hold similar mental models across specific team members depends on the task decomposition mechanisms used: task complexity and decomposability, subtask assigned and layer, task modularity, workflow interdependence type and tool attributes.\n\n\nFindings\nUnlike much prior research which measured the relationship between SMMs and team performance at the team level, our conceptualization suggests that the measurement of SMMs and team performance needs to be conducted across a team and subsets of the team or individuals depending on task complexity and decomposability. This current research offers an important viewpoint regarding when team members need to hold similar mental models to realize task performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy suggesting new insights into when mental models should be similar across specific team members, this research also provides understanding of why some empirical SMMs studies do not yield positive relationships between similar SMMs and team effectiveness while others do.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared mental models and task decomposition\",\"authors\":\"JoAnne Yong-Kwan Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tpm-07-2021-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe research on shared mental models (SMMs) focuses on the importance of all team members holding similar mental models to realize team performance. However, for a perceived decomposable task, it is not required for all team members to have similar mental models to achieve team performance. Moreover, unnecessary overlapping mental models among team members may engender information overloading, translating into suboptimal team performance. Absent from the current literature is an understanding of the factors that determine the minimal overlapping mental models required across specific members for team performance. The purpose of this study is to yield an understanding of these issues.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study highlights that the requirement to hold similar mental models across specific team members depends on the task decomposition mechanisms used: task complexity and decomposability, subtask assigned and layer, task modularity, workflow interdependence type and tool attributes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nUnlike much prior research which measured the relationship between SMMs and team performance at the team level, our conceptualization suggests that the measurement of SMMs and team performance needs to be conducted across a team and subsets of the team or individuals depending on task complexity and decomposability. This current research offers an important viewpoint regarding when team members need to hold similar mental models to realize task performance.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nBy suggesting new insights into when mental models should be similar across specific team members, this research also provides understanding of why some empirical SMMs studies do not yield positive relationships between similar SMMs and team effectiveness while others do.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Team Performance Management: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Team Performance Management: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-07-2021-0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-07-2021-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的对共享心理模型(SMMs)的研究主要关注所有拥有相似心理模型的团队成员对实现团队绩效的重要性。然而,对于一个可分解的任务,并不需要所有团队成员都有相似的心理模型来实现团队绩效。此外,团队成员之间不必要的重叠心理模型可能会导致信息过载,转化为次优团队绩效。目前的文献中缺乏对决定团队绩效所需的特定成员之间最小重叠心理模型的因素的理解。本研究的目的是对这些问题有一个了解。设计/方法论/方法本研究强调了在特定团队成员之间保持相似心智模型的需求取决于所使用的任务分解机制:任务复杂性和可分解性、分配的子任务和分层、任务模块化、工作流相互依赖类型和工具属性。与之前在团队层面测量smm和团队绩效之间关系的许多研究一样,我们的概念表明smm和团队绩效的测量需要在团队和团队或个人的子集中进行,这取决于任务的复杂性和可分解性。当前的研究提供了一个重要的观点,即团队成员何时需要持有相似的心理模型来实现任务绩效。原创性/价值通过对特定团队成员的心理模型何时应该相似提出新的见解,本研究还提供了理解为什么一些实证的smm研究没有得出相似的smm与团队效率之间的积极关系,而另一些则有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared mental models and task decomposition
Purpose The research on shared mental models (SMMs) focuses on the importance of all team members holding similar mental models to realize team performance. However, for a perceived decomposable task, it is not required for all team members to have similar mental models to achieve team performance. Moreover, unnecessary overlapping mental models among team members may engender information overloading, translating into suboptimal team performance. Absent from the current literature is an understanding of the factors that determine the minimal overlapping mental models required across specific members for team performance. The purpose of this study is to yield an understanding of these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study highlights that the requirement to hold similar mental models across specific team members depends on the task decomposition mechanisms used: task complexity and decomposability, subtask assigned and layer, task modularity, workflow interdependence type and tool attributes. Findings Unlike much prior research which measured the relationship between SMMs and team performance at the team level, our conceptualization suggests that the measurement of SMMs and team performance needs to be conducted across a team and subsets of the team or individuals depending on task complexity and decomposability. This current research offers an important viewpoint regarding when team members need to hold similar mental models to realize task performance. Originality/value By suggesting new insights into when mental models should be similar across specific team members, this research also provides understanding of why some empirical SMMs studies do not yield positive relationships between similar SMMs and team effectiveness while others do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信