学生与教师对有效物理教与学的看法

Bishnu Kumar Dahal
{"title":"学生与教师对有效物理教与学的看法","authors":"Bishnu Kumar Dahal","doi":"10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates how secondary school learners as well as teachers perceived effective physics learning and instruction. Consequently, a quantitative survey methodology was adopted for the investigation. Fifty-five students enrolled in grade twelve of two institutional secondary schools in Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts formed the sample size of the study. Seven teachers were enrolled in the study to collect data from two schools. The study was directed by two research questions. Researchers created a questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale as a tool for data collection. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine the reliability coefficient, which was found to be 0.84 after the instrument had undergone validation. In order to guarantee a 100 percent return, the researcher circulated the surveys via a Google Form and collected them. After the data were analyzed using mean and frequency distribution analysis to answer the research questions, the percentage of students’ and teachers’ responses to each item was calculated and tabulated. Some of the conclusions that were reached include the fact that most students’ comprehension of physics has a weak foundation.","PeriodicalId":157329,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Development Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students' and Teachers' Perceptions on Effective Physics Teaching and Learning\",\"authors\":\"Bishnu Kumar Dahal\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research investigates how secondary school learners as well as teachers perceived effective physics learning and instruction. Consequently, a quantitative survey methodology was adopted for the investigation. Fifty-five students enrolled in grade twelve of two institutional secondary schools in Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts formed the sample size of the study. Seven teachers were enrolled in the study to collect data from two schools. The study was directed by two research questions. Researchers created a questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale as a tool for data collection. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine the reliability coefficient, which was found to be 0.84 after the instrument had undergone validation. In order to guarantee a 100 percent return, the researcher circulated the surveys via a Google Form and collected them. After the data were analyzed using mean and frequency distribution analysis to answer the research questions, the percentage of students’ and teachers’ responses to each item was calculated and tabulated. Some of the conclusions that were reached include the fact that most students’ comprehension of physics has a weak foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨中学学生与教师如何感知有效的物理学习与教学。因此,调查采用了定量调查方法。在加德满都和拉利特普尔地区的两所机构中学就读的55名12年级学生构成了研究的样本量。七名教师参与了这项研究,从两所学校收集数据。这项研究是由两个研究问题引导的。研究人员制作了一份四分李克特量表的调查问卷,作为数据收集的工具。采用Cronbach’s alpha法确定信度系数,经仪器验证后信度系数为0.84。为了保证100%的回报,研究人员通过谷歌表格分发调查并收集他们。在使用均值分布和频率分布分析对研究问题进行数据分析后,计算出学生和教师对每个问题的回答百分比并制成表格。得出的一些结论包括这样一个事实:大多数学生对物理的理解基础薄弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students' and Teachers' Perceptions on Effective Physics Teaching and Learning
This research investigates how secondary school learners as well as teachers perceived effective physics learning and instruction. Consequently, a quantitative survey methodology was adopted for the investigation. Fifty-five students enrolled in grade twelve of two institutional secondary schools in Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts formed the sample size of the study. Seven teachers were enrolled in the study to collect data from two schools. The study was directed by two research questions. Researchers created a questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale as a tool for data collection. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine the reliability coefficient, which was found to be 0.84 after the instrument had undergone validation. In order to guarantee a 100 percent return, the researcher circulated the surveys via a Google Form and collected them. After the data were analyzed using mean and frequency distribution analysis to answer the research questions, the percentage of students’ and teachers’ responses to each item was calculated and tabulated. Some of the conclusions that were reached include the fact that most students’ comprehension of physics has a weak foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信