监管洞察- CER通讯-第02卷第04期

Anoop Singh
{"title":"监管洞察- CER通讯-第02卷第04期","authors":"Anoop Singh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3644783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 pandemic has immediate as well as long-term concerns for the regulators and the policy makers. Its impact on power system is reflected in general decline of energy sales and, a change in composition of energy sales and demand profile. Given the higher proportion of fixed cost component in costs as compared to the proportion of revenue from fixed charges in total revenue, a decline in energy sale, particularly those of subsidizing categories, would widen the revenue gap. <br>The need for tariff revision and/or additional subsidy for the current and subsequent financial years is a cause for regulatory concern. Further, the pandemic's impact would be felt across the supply chain due to low PLF of high variable cost generators and decline in the sale of coal. <br><br>Reduction in renewable energy cost, even below that of conventional sources, needs to be reflected in floor price of solar/non-solar RECs, which has been proposed to be brought down to zero. Further, the uniform forbearance price at t 1 000/MWh provides the right framework to do away with prevailing segregation by merging solar and non-solar REC markets. <br><br>Increasing share of RE generation in RE rich states such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu is leading to regulatory proposals removing/diluting the available preferential benefits to RE based generation. Since such concerns are arising on account of variability and uncertainty associated with variable RE generation, changes in the regulatory framework are required to make them more accountable to grid through uniform applicability of deviation related charges, and by enabling creation of a market for storage services as it becomes more economical in future. <br><br>Real-time monitoring of solar rooftop installations is a key to ensure that distribution utilities do not lose the visibility of behind the meter solar generation. Large rooftop installations (say, above 50/100 kW) should have adequate capability to enable real-time monitoring at the cost of owners. A sample of smaller installations should also be monitored by the distribution utility by making adequate investment, which should be approved by the SERCs. <br><br>Regulatory lag in RE tariff determination inadequately reflects decline in RE cost. Dynamic linking of the regulated tariff to the one determined through competitive bidding can address this. Regulated tariff for small scale projects, which are not exposed to competitive bidding process, can also be linked with adequate margin to compensate for diseconomies of scale. As an alternative, a competitive market for small scale projects can be developed by bundling a large number of identified projects.","PeriodicalId":332912,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Power Engineering (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Insights - CER Newsletter - Volume 02 Issue 04\",\"authors\":\"Anoop Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3644783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 pandemic has immediate as well as long-term concerns for the regulators and the policy makers. Its impact on power system is reflected in general decline of energy sales and, a change in composition of energy sales and demand profile. Given the higher proportion of fixed cost component in costs as compared to the proportion of revenue from fixed charges in total revenue, a decline in energy sale, particularly those of subsidizing categories, would widen the revenue gap. <br>The need for tariff revision and/or additional subsidy for the current and subsequent financial years is a cause for regulatory concern. Further, the pandemic's impact would be felt across the supply chain due to low PLF of high variable cost generators and decline in the sale of coal. <br><br>Reduction in renewable energy cost, even below that of conventional sources, needs to be reflected in floor price of solar/non-solar RECs, which has been proposed to be brought down to zero. Further, the uniform forbearance price at t 1 000/MWh provides the right framework to do away with prevailing segregation by merging solar and non-solar REC markets. <br><br>Increasing share of RE generation in RE rich states such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu is leading to regulatory proposals removing/diluting the available preferential benefits to RE based generation. Since such concerns are arising on account of variability and uncertainty associated with variable RE generation, changes in the regulatory framework are required to make them more accountable to grid through uniform applicability of deviation related charges, and by enabling creation of a market for storage services as it becomes more economical in future. <br><br>Real-time monitoring of solar rooftop installations is a key to ensure that distribution utilities do not lose the visibility of behind the meter solar generation. Large rooftop installations (say, above 50/100 kW) should have adequate capability to enable real-time monitoring at the cost of owners. A sample of smaller installations should also be monitored by the distribution utility by making adequate investment, which should be approved by the SERCs. <br><br>Regulatory lag in RE tariff determination inadequately reflects decline in RE cost. Dynamic linking of the regulated tariff to the one determined through competitive bidding can address this. Regulated tariff for small scale projects, which are not exposed to competitive bidding process, can also be linked with adequate margin to compensate for diseconomies of scale. As an alternative, a competitive market for small scale projects can be developed by bundling a large number of identified projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EngRN: Power Engineering (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EngRN: Power Engineering (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Power Engineering (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行对监管机构和政策制定者来说既是眼前的问题,也是长期的问题。它对电力系统的影响反映在能源销售的普遍下降以及能源销售和需求结构的变化上。由于固定费用在成本中所占的比例高于固定费用收入在总收入中所占的比例,能源销售,特别是补贴类能源销售的下降将扩大收入差距。在当前和以后的财政年度,需要修订电价和/或额外补贴,这是监管部门关注的一个问题。此外,由于高可变成本发电机的PLF降低以及煤炭销售下降,整个供应链都将感受到疫情的影响。可再生能源成本的降低,甚至低于常规能源的成本,需要反映在太阳能/非太阳能综合能源中心的底价中,已提议将底价降至零。此外,1 000美元/兆瓦时的统一容忍价格为合并太阳能和非太阳能REC市场提供了正确的框架,以消除目前存在的隔离。在安得拉邦和泰米尔纳德邦等可再生能源丰富的邦,可再生能源发电的份额不断增加,导致监管机构提出取消/稀释可再生能源发电的现有优惠政策。由于这些问题是由于与可变可再生能源发电相关的可变性和不确定性引起的,因此需要改变监管框架,通过统一适用与偏差有关的收费,并通过创建存储服务市场,使其在未来变得更加经济,从而使其对电网更加负责。对太阳能屋顶装置的实时监控是确保配电设施不会失去对太阳能发电可见性的关键。大型屋顶装置(例如50/100千瓦以上)应该有足够的能力实现实时监控,但业主需要承担费用。配电公司也应通过适当的投资来监测小型装置的样本,并应得到证监会的批准。可再生能源价格确定的监管滞后不能充分反映可再生能源成本的下降。将受管制的电价与通过竞争性招标确定的电价动态挂钩可以解决这一问题。小型项目不受竞争性招标程序的管制关税也可以与适当的利润挂钩,以补偿规模不经济。作为一种替代办法,可以通过将大量已确定的项目捆绑在一起,为小型项目开发一个竞争性市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulatory Insights - CER Newsletter - Volume 02 Issue 04
COVID-19 pandemic has immediate as well as long-term concerns for the regulators and the policy makers. Its impact on power system is reflected in general decline of energy sales and, a change in composition of energy sales and demand profile. Given the higher proportion of fixed cost component in costs as compared to the proportion of revenue from fixed charges in total revenue, a decline in energy sale, particularly those of subsidizing categories, would widen the revenue gap.
The need for tariff revision and/or additional subsidy for the current and subsequent financial years is a cause for regulatory concern. Further, the pandemic's impact would be felt across the supply chain due to low PLF of high variable cost generators and decline in the sale of coal.

Reduction in renewable energy cost, even below that of conventional sources, needs to be reflected in floor price of solar/non-solar RECs, which has been proposed to be brought down to zero. Further, the uniform forbearance price at t 1 000/MWh provides the right framework to do away with prevailing segregation by merging solar and non-solar REC markets.

Increasing share of RE generation in RE rich states such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu is leading to regulatory proposals removing/diluting the available preferential benefits to RE based generation. Since such concerns are arising on account of variability and uncertainty associated with variable RE generation, changes in the regulatory framework are required to make them more accountable to grid through uniform applicability of deviation related charges, and by enabling creation of a market for storage services as it becomes more economical in future.

Real-time monitoring of solar rooftop installations is a key to ensure that distribution utilities do not lose the visibility of behind the meter solar generation. Large rooftop installations (say, above 50/100 kW) should have adequate capability to enable real-time monitoring at the cost of owners. A sample of smaller installations should also be monitored by the distribution utility by making adequate investment, which should be approved by the SERCs.

Regulatory lag in RE tariff determination inadequately reflects decline in RE cost. Dynamic linking of the regulated tariff to the one determined through competitive bidding can address this. Regulated tariff for small scale projects, which are not exposed to competitive bidding process, can also be linked with adequate margin to compensate for diseconomies of scale. As an alternative, a competitive market for small scale projects can be developed by bundling a large number of identified projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信