协同建模中基于属性的锁定

Csaba Debreceni, Gábor Bergmann, I. Ráth, Dániel Varró
{"title":"协同建模中基于属性的锁定","authors":"Csaba Debreceni, Gábor Bergmann, I. Ráth, Dániel Varró","doi":"10.1109/MODELS.2017.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale model-driven engineering projects are carried out collaboratively. Enabling a high degree of concurrency is required to make the traditionally rigid development processes more agile. The increasing number of collaborators increases the probability of introducing conflicts which need to be resolved manually by the collaborators. In case of highly interdependent models, avoiding conflicts by the use of locks can save valuable time. However, traditional locking techniques such as fragment-based and object-based strategies may impose unnecessary restrictions on editing, which can decrease the efficiency of collaboration.In this paper, we propose a property-based locking approach that generalizes traditional locking techniques, and further allows more fine-grained locks in order to restrict modifications only when necessary. A lock is considered to be violated if a match appears or disappears for its associated graph pattern (formula), which captures the property of the model that the upcoming edit transaction can be freely executed. An initial evaluation has been carried out using a case study of the MONDO EU project.","PeriodicalId":162884,"journal":{"name":"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property-Based Locking in Collaborative Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Csaba Debreceni, Gábor Bergmann, I. Ráth, Dániel Varró\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MODELS.2017.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large-scale model-driven engineering projects are carried out collaboratively. Enabling a high degree of concurrency is required to make the traditionally rigid development processes more agile. The increasing number of collaborators increases the probability of introducing conflicts which need to be resolved manually by the collaborators. In case of highly interdependent models, avoiding conflicts by the use of locks can save valuable time. However, traditional locking techniques such as fragment-based and object-based strategies may impose unnecessary restrictions on editing, which can decrease the efficiency of collaboration.In this paper, we propose a property-based locking approach that generalizes traditional locking techniques, and further allows more fine-grained locks in order to restrict modifications only when necessary. A lock is considered to be violated if a match appears or disappears for its associated graph pattern (formula), which captures the property of the model that the upcoming edit transaction can be freely executed. An initial evaluation has been carried out using a case study of the MONDO EU project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS.2017.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS.2017.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

大型模型驱动工程项目协同进行。要使传统上严格的开发过程更加敏捷,就需要启用高度的并发性。协作者数量的增加增加了引入冲突的可能性,这些冲突需要协作者手动解决。在高度依赖模型的情况下,通过使用锁来避免冲突可以节省宝贵的时间。然而,传统的锁定技术,如基于片段和基于对象的策略,可能会对编辑施加不必要的限制,从而降低协作的效率。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于属性的锁定方法,它推广了传统的锁定技术,并进一步允许更细粒度的锁定,以便仅在必要时限制修改。如果与其关联的图模式(公式)匹配出现或消失,则认为违反了锁,这捕获了模型的属性,即即将到来的编辑事务可以自由执行。利用MONDO欧盟项目的案例研究进行了初步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Property-Based Locking in Collaborative Modeling
Large-scale model-driven engineering projects are carried out collaboratively. Enabling a high degree of concurrency is required to make the traditionally rigid development processes more agile. The increasing number of collaborators increases the probability of introducing conflicts which need to be resolved manually by the collaborators. In case of highly interdependent models, avoiding conflicts by the use of locks can save valuable time. However, traditional locking techniques such as fragment-based and object-based strategies may impose unnecessary restrictions on editing, which can decrease the efficiency of collaboration.In this paper, we propose a property-based locking approach that generalizes traditional locking techniques, and further allows more fine-grained locks in order to restrict modifications only when necessary. A lock is considered to be violated if a match appears or disappears for its associated graph pattern (formula), which captures the property of the model that the upcoming edit transaction can be freely executed. An initial evaluation has been carried out using a case study of the MONDO EU project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信