发展研究能力:确定和量化护理研究活动在NHS

J. Tanner, C. Hale
{"title":"发展研究能力:确定和量化护理研究活动在NHS","authors":"J. Tanner, C. Hale","doi":"10.1177/136140960200700309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many hospitals are beginning to implement strategies that should strengthen and support nursing research capacity. One large NHS trust hospital in England wished to identify the level and scope of its nursing research activity to provide a baseline against which to measure future progress and to provide information that would contribute to its capacity-building strategy. The primary aim of the study was to identify the number of research-active nurses within the trust. A 'walkabout', database search and interviews with senior nurses suggested that 34 out of 1,574 nurses (2.1%) were considered to be research active, with 14 of these nurses having at least one publication. When compared with other studies measuring nursing research activity, 2.1% was found to be significantly lower than the findings in all these other studies. However, analysis suggests that the differences in reported levels of research activity might be due to differing sampling methods and various definitions of what constitutes research activity. Comparing extrapolated data (number of publications) from each study suggests that research activity is comparable throughout the UK and in Australia.","PeriodicalId":177021,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Times Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing research capacity: Identifying and quantifying nursing research activity in the NHS\",\"authors\":\"J. Tanner, C. Hale\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/136140960200700309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many hospitals are beginning to implement strategies that should strengthen and support nursing research capacity. One large NHS trust hospital in England wished to identify the level and scope of its nursing research activity to provide a baseline against which to measure future progress and to provide information that would contribute to its capacity-building strategy. The primary aim of the study was to identify the number of research-active nurses within the trust. A 'walkabout', database search and interviews with senior nurses suggested that 34 out of 1,574 nurses (2.1%) were considered to be research active, with 14 of these nurses having at least one publication. When compared with other studies measuring nursing research activity, 2.1% was found to be significantly lower than the findings in all these other studies. However, analysis suggests that the differences in reported levels of research activity might be due to differing sampling methods and various definitions of what constitutes research activity. Comparing extrapolated data (number of publications) from each study suggests that research activity is comparable throughout the UK and in Australia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Times Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Times Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/136140960200700309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Times Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/136140960200700309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

许多医院正在开始实施加强和支持护理研究能力的战略。英国一家大型国民保健制度信托医院希望确定其护理研究活动的水平和范围,以提供衡量未来进展的基线,并提供有助于其能力建设战略的信息。该研究的主要目的是确定信托基金中积极从事研究的护士的数量。“漫步”、数据库检索和对高级护士的访谈显示,1,574名护士中有34名(2.1%)被认为是研究活跃的,其中14名护士至少发表过一篇出版物。当与其他测量护理研究活动的研究相比较时,发现2.1%明显低于所有其他研究的结果。然而,分析表明,报告的研究活动水平的差异可能是由于不同的抽样方法和对什么构成研究活动的不同定义。比较每项研究的外推数据(出版物数量)表明,整个英国和澳大利亚的研究活动具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing research capacity: Identifying and quantifying nursing research activity in the NHS
Many hospitals are beginning to implement strategies that should strengthen and support nursing research capacity. One large NHS trust hospital in England wished to identify the level and scope of its nursing research activity to provide a baseline against which to measure future progress and to provide information that would contribute to its capacity-building strategy. The primary aim of the study was to identify the number of research-active nurses within the trust. A 'walkabout', database search and interviews with senior nurses suggested that 34 out of 1,574 nurses (2.1%) were considered to be research active, with 14 of these nurses having at least one publication. When compared with other studies measuring nursing research activity, 2.1% was found to be significantly lower than the findings in all these other studies. However, analysis suggests that the differences in reported levels of research activity might be due to differing sampling methods and various definitions of what constitutes research activity. Comparing extrapolated data (number of publications) from each study suggests that research activity is comparable throughout the UK and in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信