用于评估宫颈癌检测试验和人乳头瘤病毒基因型在检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌中的有效性的综合特征排序框架

P. Bountris, Charalambos Tsirmpas, M. Haritou, A. Pouliakis, Ioannis N. Kouris, P. Karakitsos, D. Koutsouris
{"title":"用于评估宫颈癌检测试验和人乳头瘤病毒基因型在检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌中的有效性的综合特征排序框架","authors":"P. Bountris, Charalambos Tsirmpas, M. Haritou, A. Pouliakis, Ioannis N. Kouris, P. Karakitsos, D. Koutsouris","doi":"10.1109/BIBE.2015.7367657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most cases, cervical cancer (CxCa) develops as a result of underestimated abnormalities present in cytology via the test Papanicolaou (Pap test). Although it is the sole test that has proved its value for cancer prevention, Pap test is prone to human errors as it is performed via the microscope and requires skilled personnel. Consequently, molecular techniques have emerged in the recent years, aiming to replace Pap test or support the diagnosis as ancillary tests. These include DNA micro-arrays identifying Human Papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes, mRNA techniques such as nucleic acid based amplification or flow cytometry identifying E6/E7 oncogenes, and immunocytochemistry techniques such as overexpression of p16. These techniques are either highly sensitive or highly specific, but not both at the same time, thus no perfect method is available today. Moreover, most of the published studies compare two tests against each other, which, however, are using different population study groups, therefore it is questionable if the results can be used to perform a direct comparison between the available tests. In this paper, we adopt a sophisticated approach to assess the value of several well-known and widely applied CxCa tests in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and CxCa (CIN2+), by employing an Ensemble Feature Ranking framework. Applying the proposed framework we managed to directly compare and rank the studied CxCa tests and several HPV genotypes according to their efficacy in detecting CIN2+ lesions. The results suggest that HPV mRNA tests perform better than HPV DNA testing for the triage of abnormal Pap tests. Such findings may guide cytopathologists in a step by step basis to decide which tests to perform following an abnormal Pap test, in order to decrease uncertainty, improve accuracy and reduce time to diagnosis and resources.","PeriodicalId":422807,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ensemble feature ranking framework for the assessment of the efficacy of cervical cancer detection tests and human papillomavirus genotypes in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"P. Bountris, Charalambos Tsirmpas, M. Haritou, A. Pouliakis, Ioannis N. Kouris, P. Karakitsos, D. Koutsouris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIBE.2015.7367657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most cases, cervical cancer (CxCa) develops as a result of underestimated abnormalities present in cytology via the test Papanicolaou (Pap test). Although it is the sole test that has proved its value for cancer prevention, Pap test is prone to human errors as it is performed via the microscope and requires skilled personnel. Consequently, molecular techniques have emerged in the recent years, aiming to replace Pap test or support the diagnosis as ancillary tests. These include DNA micro-arrays identifying Human Papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes, mRNA techniques such as nucleic acid based amplification or flow cytometry identifying E6/E7 oncogenes, and immunocytochemistry techniques such as overexpression of p16. These techniques are either highly sensitive or highly specific, but not both at the same time, thus no perfect method is available today. Moreover, most of the published studies compare two tests against each other, which, however, are using different population study groups, therefore it is questionable if the results can be used to perform a direct comparison between the available tests. In this paper, we adopt a sophisticated approach to assess the value of several well-known and widely applied CxCa tests in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and CxCa (CIN2+), by employing an Ensemble Feature Ranking framework. Applying the proposed framework we managed to directly compare and rank the studied CxCa tests and several HPV genotypes according to their efficacy in detecting CIN2+ lesions. The results suggest that HPV mRNA tests perform better than HPV DNA testing for the triage of abnormal Pap tests. Such findings may guide cytopathologists in a step by step basis to decide which tests to perform following an abnormal Pap test, in order to decrease uncertainty, improve accuracy and reduce time to diagnosis and resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2015.7367657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2015.7367657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在大多数情况下,宫颈癌(CxCa)的发展是由于通过巴氏试验(巴氏试验)在细胞学中存在的被低估的异常。虽然这是唯一证明其预防癌症价值的检查,但巴氏试验很容易出现人为错误,因为它是通过显微镜进行的,需要熟练的人员。因此,近年来出现了分子技术,旨在取代巴氏涂片检查或作为辅助检查支持诊断。这些技术包括鉴定人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)亚型的DNA微阵列技术,鉴定E6/E7致癌基因的核酸扩增或流式细胞术等mRNA技术,以及p16过表达等免疫细胞化学技术。这些技术要么是高度敏感的,要么是高度特异性的,但不是同时具备这两种技术,因此目前还没有完美的方法。此外,大多数发表的研究将两种测试相互比较,然而,这些测试使用的是不同的人口研究组,因此,其结果是否可以用于在现有测试之间进行直接比较是值得怀疑的。在本文中,我们采用了一种复杂的方法来评估几个众所周知的和广泛应用的CxCa检测在检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和CxCa (CIN2+)方面的价值,采用了一个集成特征排名框架。应用所提出的框架,我们根据检测CIN2+病变的有效性,对所研究的CxCa检测和几种HPV基因型进行了直接比较和排序。结果表明,HPV mRNA检测比HPV DNA检测对异常巴氏试验的分类效果更好。这些发现可以指导细胞病理学家在异常巴氏试验后逐步决定进行哪些检查,以减少不确定性,提高准确性,减少诊断时间和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ensemble feature ranking framework for the assessment of the efficacy of cervical cancer detection tests and human papillomavirus genotypes in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma
In most cases, cervical cancer (CxCa) develops as a result of underestimated abnormalities present in cytology via the test Papanicolaou (Pap test). Although it is the sole test that has proved its value for cancer prevention, Pap test is prone to human errors as it is performed via the microscope and requires skilled personnel. Consequently, molecular techniques have emerged in the recent years, aiming to replace Pap test or support the diagnosis as ancillary tests. These include DNA micro-arrays identifying Human Papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes, mRNA techniques such as nucleic acid based amplification or flow cytometry identifying E6/E7 oncogenes, and immunocytochemistry techniques such as overexpression of p16. These techniques are either highly sensitive or highly specific, but not both at the same time, thus no perfect method is available today. Moreover, most of the published studies compare two tests against each other, which, however, are using different population study groups, therefore it is questionable if the results can be used to perform a direct comparison between the available tests. In this paper, we adopt a sophisticated approach to assess the value of several well-known and widely applied CxCa tests in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and CxCa (CIN2+), by employing an Ensemble Feature Ranking framework. Applying the proposed framework we managed to directly compare and rank the studied CxCa tests and several HPV genotypes according to their efficacy in detecting CIN2+ lesions. The results suggest that HPV mRNA tests perform better than HPV DNA testing for the triage of abnormal Pap tests. Such findings may guide cytopathologists in a step by step basis to decide which tests to perform following an abnormal Pap test, in order to decrease uncertainty, improve accuracy and reduce time to diagnosis and resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信