普通税收和合同工具的风险分散特性

James K. Sebenius, P. Stan
{"title":"普通税收和合同工具的风险分散特性","authors":"James K. Sebenius, P. Stan","doi":"10.2307/3003475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many tax systems require payment by means of fixed fees, percentages of gross revenues (royalties or ad valorem taxes), or percentages of net income (profit shares or income taxes). Even when payments due under such instruments have the same expected value, their risk-spreading properties may differ. For equal expected levies, profit-sharing is often ranked as the most effective means of risk-spreading, followed by royalty payments, and finally by fixed fees. When revenues and costs are both uncertain, however, we demonstrate that this common risk-ranking is not generally valid and discuss reasons for its breakdown.","PeriodicalId":177728,"journal":{"name":"The Bell Journal of Economics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-spreading properties of common tax and contract instruments\",\"authors\":\"James K. Sebenius, P. Stan\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3003475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many tax systems require payment by means of fixed fees, percentages of gross revenues (royalties or ad valorem taxes), or percentages of net income (profit shares or income taxes). Even when payments due under such instruments have the same expected value, their risk-spreading properties may differ. For equal expected levies, profit-sharing is often ranked as the most effective means of risk-spreading, followed by royalty payments, and finally by fixed fees. When revenues and costs are both uncertain, however, we demonstrate that this common risk-ranking is not generally valid and discuss reasons for its breakdown.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bell Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

许多税收制度要求以固定费用、总收入的百分比(特许权使用费或从价税)或净收入的百分比(利润份额或所得税)的方式纳税。即使这些工具下的到期付款具有相同的预期价值,它们的风险扩散特性也可能不同。对于相等的预期征税,利润分享通常被列为最有效的风险分摊方式,其次是特许权使用费,最后是固定费用。然而,当收入和成本都不确定时,我们证明了这种常见的风险排名通常是无效的,并讨论了其崩溃的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk-spreading properties of common tax and contract instruments
Many tax systems require payment by means of fixed fees, percentages of gross revenues (royalties or ad valorem taxes), or percentages of net income (profit shares or income taxes). Even when payments due under such instruments have the same expected value, their risk-spreading properties may differ. For equal expected levies, profit-sharing is often ranked as the most effective means of risk-spreading, followed by royalty payments, and finally by fixed fees. When revenues and costs are both uncertain, however, we demonstrate that this common risk-ranking is not generally valid and discuss reasons for its breakdown.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信