{"title":"技术独立边界扫描合成(设计流程问题)","authors":"M. Robinson","doi":"10.1109/EURDAC.1993.410670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A design flow paradigm that integrates technology independent boundary scan synthesis into a chip design methodology is presented. The approach accommodates multiple vendor boundary scan technologies and the requirements of (sometimes non-1149.1-compliant) user specified boundary scan architectures. Boundary scan synthesis is described and design-specific requirements, 1149.1 compliance verification, boundary scan manufacturing test, and interfacing with the board and system test environments are discussed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":339176,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of EURO-DAC 93 and EURO-VHDL 93- European Design Automation Conference","volume":"92 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology independent boundary scan synthesis (design flow issues)\",\"authors\":\"M. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EURDAC.1993.410670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A design flow paradigm that integrates technology independent boundary scan synthesis into a chip design methodology is presented. The approach accommodates multiple vendor boundary scan technologies and the requirements of (sometimes non-1149.1-compliant) user specified boundary scan architectures. Boundary scan synthesis is described and design-specific requirements, 1149.1 compliance verification, boundary scan manufacturing test, and interfacing with the board and system test environments are discussed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":339176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of EURO-DAC 93 and EURO-VHDL 93- European Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"92 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of EURO-DAC 93 and EURO-VHDL 93- European Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURDAC.1993.410670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of EURO-DAC 93 and EURO-VHDL 93- European Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURDAC.1993.410670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A design flow paradigm that integrates technology independent boundary scan synthesis into a chip design methodology is presented. The approach accommodates multiple vendor boundary scan technologies and the requirements of (sometimes non-1149.1-compliant) user specified boundary scan architectures. Boundary scan synthesis is described and design-specific requirements, 1149.1 compliance verification, boundary scan manufacturing test, and interfacing with the board and system test environments are discussed.<>