菲律宾马尼拉城市固体废物管理中废物转化为能源技术的多准则决策分析

D. R. Rivera, Terrence Adrian Arce, Francis Rizaldy Abistano, Christian Jerrick Bathan, Adrian Alan Palo
{"title":"菲律宾马尼拉城市固体废物管理中废物转化为能源技术的多准则决策分析","authors":"D. R. Rivera, Terrence Adrian Arce, Francis Rizaldy Abistano, Christian Jerrick Bathan, Adrian Alan Palo","doi":"10.1109/HNICEM54116.2021.9731978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is utilized to provide a better strategy and increase the efficiency of solid waste management. The method aims to determine the suitable Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technology for Manila City, Philippines using a pairwise comparisons method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP utilized a hierarchy structure consists of objectives, criteria, sub criteria, and alternatives. The criteria selected were environmental, economic, technical, and sociocultural. The WTE technologies selected were anaerobic digestion, incineration, and pyrolysis. Results show that the environmental aspects with 63.80% is the chosen priority. It is followed by the economic and technical aspect with a close relative value of 14.86% and 13.32%, respectively. The sociocultural aspect is the least priority with 8.02%. Using the criteria, WTE technologies were scored and tabulated. After evaluation, it revealed that an anaerobic digester is suitable WTE technology for Manila City, Philippines. Using the chosen WTE technology, result also revealed that 249,318 m3 biogas can be generated after 21 days.","PeriodicalId":129868,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waste to Energy Technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Municipal Solid Waste Management in Manila City, Philippines\",\"authors\":\"D. R. Rivera, Terrence Adrian Arce, Francis Rizaldy Abistano, Christian Jerrick Bathan, Adrian Alan Palo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HNICEM54116.2021.9731978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is utilized to provide a better strategy and increase the efficiency of solid waste management. The method aims to determine the suitable Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technology for Manila City, Philippines using a pairwise comparisons method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP utilized a hierarchy structure consists of objectives, criteria, sub criteria, and alternatives. The criteria selected were environmental, economic, technical, and sociocultural. The WTE technologies selected were anaerobic digestion, incineration, and pyrolysis. Results show that the environmental aspects with 63.80% is the chosen priority. It is followed by the economic and technical aspect with a close relative value of 14.86% and 13.32%, respectively. The sociocultural aspect is the least priority with 8.02%. Using the criteria, WTE technologies were scored and tabulated. After evaluation, it revealed that an anaerobic digester is suitable WTE technology for Manila City, Philippines. Using the chosen WTE technology, result also revealed that 249,318 m3 biogas can be generated after 21 days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM54116.2021.9731978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM54116.2021.9731978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,多准则决策分析(MCDA)是用来提供一个更好的策略,提高固体废物管理的效率。该方法的目的是确定适合马尼拉市的废物转化为能源(WTE)技术,菲律宾使用两两比较的方法被称为层次分析法(AHP)。AHP利用由目标、标准、子标准和备选方案组成的层次结构。选择的标准包括环境、经济、技术和社会文化。选择的垃圾焚烧技术有厌氧消化、焚烧和热解。结果表明,环境因素占63.80%,被优先选择。其次是经济和技术方面,两者的相对值相近,分别为14.86%和13.32%。社会文化方面是最不重要的,占8.02%。使用这些标准,对WTE技术进行评分并制成表格。经过评估,发现厌氧消化器是适合菲律宾马尼拉市的垃圾处理技术。采用所选择的WTE技术,21天后可产生249,318 m3的沼气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Waste to Energy Technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Municipal Solid Waste Management in Manila City, Philippines
In this paper, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is utilized to provide a better strategy and increase the efficiency of solid waste management. The method aims to determine the suitable Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technology for Manila City, Philippines using a pairwise comparisons method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP utilized a hierarchy structure consists of objectives, criteria, sub criteria, and alternatives. The criteria selected were environmental, economic, technical, and sociocultural. The WTE technologies selected were anaerobic digestion, incineration, and pyrolysis. Results show that the environmental aspects with 63.80% is the chosen priority. It is followed by the economic and technical aspect with a close relative value of 14.86% and 13.32%, respectively. The sociocultural aspect is the least priority with 8.02%. Using the criteria, WTE technologies were scored and tabulated. After evaluation, it revealed that an anaerobic digester is suitable WTE technology for Manila City, Philippines. Using the chosen WTE technology, result also revealed that 249,318 m3 biogas can be generated after 21 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信