{"title":"管式电缆频率相关参数的计算方法比较","authors":"D. da Silva, G. Fernández, R. A. Rivas","doi":"10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the results of four analytical methods for the calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables are compared. Method 1 is Ametani's method, which neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 2 is a proposed method that takes proximity effects into account and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 3 is also a proposed method, but neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. Method 4 is Kane's method, which takes proximity effects into consideration and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. With respect to Kane's method, the results obtained from the three first methods yield relative errors as high as 95 %, particularly at low frequencies","PeriodicalId":406067,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation of Frequency-Dependent Parameters of Pipe-Type Cables: Comparison of Methods\",\"authors\":\"D. da Silva, G. Fernández, R. A. Rivas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the results of four analytical methods for the calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables are compared. Method 1 is Ametani's method, which neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 2 is a proposed method that takes proximity effects into account and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 3 is also a proposed method, but neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. Method 4 is Kane's method, which takes proximity effects into consideration and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. With respect to Kane's method, the results obtained from the three first methods yield relative errors as high as 95 %, particularly at low frequencies\",\"PeriodicalId\":406067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calculation of Frequency-Dependent Parameters of Pipe-Type Cables: Comparison of Methods
In this paper the results of four analytical methods for the calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables are compared. Method 1 is Ametani's method, which neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 2 is a proposed method that takes proximity effects into account and assumes that the pipe has infinite thickness. Method 3 is also a proposed method, but neglects proximity effects among conductors and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. Method 4 is Kane's method, which takes proximity effects into consideration and assumes that the pipe has finite thickness. With respect to Kane's method, the results obtained from the three first methods yield relative errors as high as 95 %, particularly at low frequencies